[PATCH 31/33] ARM i.MX5: implement clocks using common clock framework

Sascha Hauer s.hauer at pengutronix.de
Thu Apr 26 09:02:22 EDT 2012


On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 02:48:00PM +0200, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
> 
> more out of curiosity, why is the i.MX50 always excluded. Is it so vastly
> different to the MX51 and MX53?

I don't think that it's so different. I think the reason is that the
i.MX50 is not widely used outside of some special applications. At least
we have no customers using it.

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list