Some benchmarks on ARM

Marc Kleine-Budde mkl at pengutronix.de
Mon Jul 5 08:45:34 EDT 2010


Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> Colin Tuckley wrote:
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> kernel-bounces at lists.infradead.org] On Behalf Of Robert Schwebel
>>> Sent: 02 July 2010 19:03
>>> We have recently made some benchmarks, in order to get a little bit
>>> better fealing about where ARM cpus are today, especially when it comes
>>> to the "recent" ones, and in comparism to the Atom. So we collected a
>>> few benchmarks (most from lmbench) and did some actual measurements.
>> You have the family wrong for (at least) the Cortex-A8, it's a v7. This probably accounts for some of it's slow relative performance since you probably used incorrect compiler switches.
>>
>>> All measurements have been done on 2.6.34.
>> How were the kernels compiled? Was thumb mode used for the ones that support it?
>>
>> You didn't mention the cache state anywhere - it can make a big difference.
> 
> After booting all tests are done via ssh, the system was "idle" otherwise.
> 
> We're just repeating the tests with "echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches"
> prior to each test.

We'll use "sync; echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches"

Marc
-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 260 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20100705/af25163f/attachment.sig>


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list