[PATCH] afs: fix tracepoint string placement with built-in AFS

David Howells dhowells at redhat.com
Thu Jun 17 05:04:49 PDT 2021


Steven Rostedt <rostedt at goodmis.org> wrote:

> Looks fine to me, and even saves 4 bytes on 64 bit machines (events are
> rounded up to 4 byte increments, so the u16 is no different than a u32
> here).

Can I put that down as a Reviewed-by?

David




More information about the linux-afs mailing list