[PATCH] Re: Missing counter-part functions for RRULE encoded values?
Milan Crha
mcrha at redhat.com
Wed Mar 21 06:56:54 PDT 2018
On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 08:32 -0400, Ken Murchison wrote:
> I don't see any reason why we wouldn't accept such a patch.
Hi,
nice. Here's attached the proposed patch.
Let me know in case you'd like to change anything.
Thanks and bye,
Milan
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: ical.patch
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 13556 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/libical-devel/attachments/20180321/6ce6a0f0/attachment.bin>
More information about the libical-devel
mailing list