Missing counter-part functions for RRULE encoded values?

[Ken Murchison]

I don't see any reason why we wouldn't accept such a patch.


On 03/20/2018 08:27 AM, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Tue, 2018-03-20 at 08:09 -0400, Ken Murchison wrote:
>> Are you trying to build a struct icalrecurrencetype by hand?  I'm
>> not sure I understand your use case.
> 	Hi,
> correct, that's what I'm trying to do and I'd like to avoid
> constructing a string and then let libical parse it into its
> structures.
>
> To be concrete, I receive a recurrence described in XML [1] and I'd
> like to make from it the RRULE. I'm able to do it right now, but I
> still believe it'll be better to have there both encode and decode
> functions, if nothing else then for completeness.
>
> I can construct the patch, I just want to know whether it would be
> accepted by the upstream.
> 	Thanks and bye,
> 	Milan
>
> [1] https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa564273(v=exchg.150).aspx
>
> _______________________________________________
> libical-devel mailing list
> libical-devel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/libical-devel

-- 
Ken Murchison
Cyrus Development Team
FastMail US LLC

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: murch.vcf
Type: text/x-vcard
Size: 4 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/libical-devel/attachments/20180320/0966ea16/attachment.vcf>