On the proper use of the FST functionality
j at w1.fi
Sat Aug 13 11:18:27 PDT 2016
On Mon, Aug 08, 2016 at 04:39:14AM +0300, Petko Bordjukov wrote:
> Now on to the next issue. Currently hostapd does not seem to add the MB IE to
> any secondary BSSes that are configured on a given interface. Does it make sense
> to be able to define an FST group per BSS instead of per interface?
There may not be an easy and generic answer to that.. There might be use
cases where this is desired while there are likely cases where it is
not. It might make sense to provide means for configuring a subset of
configured BSSes to be included in the FST processing.
Jouni Malinen PGP id EFC895FA
More information about the Hostap