[PATCH] b43: Mask out unwanted bits of RX slot address

[Rafał Miłecki]

W dniu 14 sierpnia 2011 00:56 użytkownik David Woodhouse
<dwmw2 at infradead.org> napisał:
> On Sun, 2011-08-14 at 00:13 +0200, Rafał Miłecki wrote:
>> Interesting... below is the dump from ndiswrapper on BCM4331:
>>
>> R 4 1431.714843 2 0xb0600230 0x10000fb0 0x0 0
>> R 4 1431.740035 2 0xb0600230 0x10000fc0 0x0 0
>> R 4 1431.740050 2 0xb0600230 0x10000fc0 0x0 0
>> R 4 1431.850216 2 0xb0600230 0x10000fd0 0x0 0
>> R 4 1431.850229 2 0xb0600230 0x10000fd0 0x0 0
>> R 4 1431.882151 2 0xb0600230 0x10000fe0 0x0 0
>> R 4 1431.882164 2 0xb0600230 0x10000fe0 0x0 0
>> R 4 1431.885822 2 0xb0600230 0x10000ff0 0x0 0
>> R 4 1431.885835 2 0xb0600230 0x10000ff0 0x0 0
>> R 4 1431.896775 2 0xb0600230 0x10000000 0x0 0
>> R 4 1431.896790 2 0xb0600230 0x10000000 0x0 0
>> R 4 1431.915842 2 0xb0600230 0x10000010 0x0 0
>> R 4 1431.915857 2 0xb0600230 0x10000010 0x0 0
>> R 4 1431.917399 2 0xb0600230 0x10000020 0x0 0
>> R 4 1431.917413 2 0xb0600230 0x10000020 0x0 0
>>
>> Broadcom uses bigger ring and they don't suffer from 0x1000 being ever
>> set. I've filled the ring few times, 0x1000 was never set on going
>> back to slot 0.
>
> What was the physical address of the ring for this test run?

W 4 1279.247106 2 0xb0600228 0x1f932000 0x0 0
W 4 1279.247107 2 0xb060022c 0x80000000 0x0 0
R 4 1279.247112 2 0xb0600220 0x40 0x0 0
W 4 1279.247114 2 0xb0600220 0x84d 0x0 0
W 4 1279.259637 2 0xb0600224 0x1f932200 0x0 0

I read from the dump it was 0x000000001f932000

-- 
Rafał