Revert: ath: add support for special 0x0 regulatory domain
ALSI at bang-olufsen.dk
Tue Aug 24 01:00:54 PDT 2021
On 8/23/21 11:06 PM, Brian Norris wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 1:19 PM Andrey Skvortsov
> <andrej.skvortzov at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 21-08-23 10:23, Brian Norris wrote:
>>> Maybe it needs an Nth person to submit a revert?
>> Later (Dec 23, 2020) said "Actually I don't see how I could apply the
>> revert due to the regulatory problems explained by Jouni". 
>> I think this could be the date when your patch was marked as Rejected.
>> 1. http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/ath10k/2020-December/012370.html>>
> Oh wow, I almost forgot about that... Too many threads. I also forgot
> that I already replied, expressing my disagreement:
> But I guess it's not really expected that mainline Linux really works
> as-is on most products, unfortunately, and the maintainers don't have
> enough time or energy to provide constructive paths forward on real
> issues like this :(
Jouni gave a good explanation for why the offending patch is correct,
but it hinges on an interpretation of country code 0x0 which seems to be
incorrect. I followed up on that almost a year ago here but the
thread went cold after that.
Numerous people - myself included - have cited sources clearly
indicating that 0x0 = US, NOT unset. See the same post for more info.
I still think this patch should be reverted unless somebody can provide
a source to the contrary, re: the meaning of 0x0.
It's unfortunate that this is still affecting users, particularly when
the original author of the patch even asked for it to be reverted.
More information about the ath10k