[RFC] ath10k: change to do napi_enable and napi_disable when insmod and rmmod for sdio

Krishna Chaitanya chaitanya.mgit at gmail.com
Thu Aug 20 12:08:41 EDT 2020


On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 8:07 PM Wen Gong <wgong at codeaurora.org> wrote:
>
> On 2020-08-20 18:52, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 3:45 PM Wen Gong <wgong at codeaurora.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 2020-08-20 17:19, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
> ...
> >> >> I'm not really convinced that this is the right fix, but I'm no NAPI
> >> >> expert. Can anyone else help?
> >> > Calling napi_disable() twice can lead to hangs, but moving NAPI from
> >> > start/stop to
> >> > the probe isn't the right approach as the datapath is tied to
> >> > start/stop.
> >> >
> >> > Maybe check the state of NAPI before disable?
> >> >
> >> >  if (test_bit(NAPI_STATE_SCHED, &ar->napi.napi.state))
> >> >   napi_disable(&ar->napi)
> >> > or maintain napi_state like this
> >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10249365/
> >> it is better to use above link's patch.
> >> napi.state is controlled by napi API, it is better ath10k not know it.
> > Sure, but IMHO just canceling the async rx work should solve the issue.
> Oh no, canceling the async rx work will not solve this issue, rx worker
> ath10k_rx_indication_async_work call napi_schedule, after napi_complete,
> the NAPI_STATE_SCHED will clear.
> The issue of this patch is because 2 thread called to hif_stop and
> NAPI_STATE_SCHED not clear.
That fix is still valid and good to have.

ndev_stop being called twice is typical scenarios (stop vs rmmod), so
 just checking the netdev_flags for IFF_UP and returning from hif_Stop
should suffice, no?



More information about the ath10k mailing list