Question on "ath10k: document ofdm/5ghz rate offset with a macro"

Michal Kazior michal.kazior at
Tue Jun 7 06:16:52 PDT 2016

On 7 June 2016 at 14:57, Ben Greear <greearb at> wrote:
> On 06/06/2016 11:23 PM, Michal Kazior wrote:
>> On 6 June 2016 at 23:25, Ben Greear <greearb at> wrote:
>>> While porting some patches forward, I notice the change below
>>> that renamed the method to "ath10k_mac_sta_has_ofdm_only".  But,
>>> that is not really what that is checking, since it just throws
>>> away the CCK rates (and they might have been there).
>>> Maybe it should just be "ath10k_mac_sta_has_ofdm()" ?
>> Yes, this seems like an unfortunate name pick on my side. The MODE_11G
>> phymode is for mixed b/g.
> I think the actual code behaviour is right.  I have some patches to
> support G-only mode and such, and will change the name of your method
> in those patches to be more clear.
> Lots of other pending patches of mine before I will get to trying to push
> that one upstream though.

Hmm.. I do recall 11G_ONLY phymode didn't play out well with 11B
coexistance in AP mode. I can't remember the details though..


More information about the ath10k mailing list