[PATCH v2 2/2] ath10k: add testmode
Kalle Valo
kvalo at qca.qualcomm.com
Thu Aug 28 23:54:03 PDT 2014
Michal Kazior <michal.kazior at tieto.com> writes:
> On 28 August 2014 09:30, Kalle Valo <kvalo at qca.qualcomm.com> wrote:
>> @@ -2483,8 +2484,12 @@ static int ath10k_start(struct ieee80211_hw *hw)
>> case ATH10K_STATE_RESTARTED:
>> case ATH10K_STATE_WEDGED:
>> WARN_ON(1);
>> + /* fall through */
>
> Fall through? I see there's a goto ahead..
>> ret = -EINVAL;
>> goto err;
Fixed.
>> +/* "API" level of the ath10k testmode interface. Bump it after every
>> + * incompatible interface change. */
>
> I recall we reached a conclusion to use the following multiline
> comment style in ath10k:
>
> /* Foo
> * Bar
> */
>
> Ah, here it is: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-wireless/msg123419.html
>
> But this isn't really important.
I fixed all the multiline comments now.
And I did remember that we agreed about this but I just forgot how it's
supposed to look :) To be able to reasily refresh my memory I documented
this to the wiki:
http://wireless.kernel.org/en/users/Drivers/ath10k/CodingStyle#Comments
>> + if (ar->testmode.utf != NULL)
>> + /* utf image is already downloaded */
>> + goto power_up;
>> +
>> +
>
> 2 empty newlines.
Fixed.
>> + snprintf(filename, sizeof(filename), "%s/%s",
>> + ar->hw_params.fw.dir, ATH10K_FW_UTF_FILE);
>> +
>> + /* load utf image now and release only when the device is removed */
>> + ret = request_firmware(&ar->testmode.utf, filename, ar->dev);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + ath10k_warn(ar, "failed to retrieve utf firmware '%s': %d\n",
>> + filename, ret);
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(ar->fw_features) !=
>> + sizeof(ar->testmode.orig_fw_features));
>> +
>
>> + memcpy(ar->testmode.orig_fw_features, ar->fw_features,
>> + sizeof(ar->fw_features));
>> +
>> + /* force to use correct version of WMI interface */
>> + memset(ar->fw_features, 0, sizeof(ar->fw_features));
>> + __set_bit(ATH10K_FW_FEATURE_WMI_10X, ar->fw_features);
>
> I'm a little worried about this.
Yeah, this is an ugly hack. But at the same time I don't see much point
of changing the rest of driver just because of testmode.
> First of all the comment doesn't really explain why this is done, i.e.
> utf.bin isn't FW IE encapsulated and as such fw_features are unknown.
I'll add that.
> And then what about utf binaries which use 10.2 WMI? Or non-10.x WMI?
Right now I don't see any use of that. Think of this like FW API 1 where
we don't have any IE support.
>> +power_up:
>> + spin_lock_bh(&ar->data_lock);
>> +
>> + ar->testmode.utf_monitor = true;
>> +
>> + spin_unlock_bh(&ar->data_lock);
>> +
>> + ret = ath10k_hif_power_up(ar);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + ath10k_err(ar, "failed to power up hif (testmode): %d\n", ret);
>> + ar->state = ATH10K_STATE_OFF;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>> +
>> + ret = ath10k_core_start(ar, ATH10K_FIRMWARE_MODE_UTF);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + ath10k_err(ar, "failed to start core (testmode): %d\n", ret);
>> + ath10k_hif_power_down(ar);
>> + ar->state = ATH10K_STATE_OFF;
>> + goto out;
>> + }
>
> You don't seem to be freeing firmware on failure here. I'm aware
> ath10k_testmode_destroy() takes care of it but if you happen to use a
> defect fw (or hit some kind of a fw-hw combination bug) each
> subsequent utf start will re-use the firmware binary - it won't
> re-read the binary (giving you a chance to replace utf binary with a
> different one) unless you reload the whole module or re-bind the
> device<->driver via sysfs or physically.
That's a clear bug, will fix.
>> +static int ath10k_tm_cmd_wmi(struct ath10k *ar, struct nlattr *tb[])
>> +{
>> + struct sk_buff *skb;
>> + int ret, buf_len;
>> + u32 cmd_id;
>> + void *buf;
>> +
>> + mutex_lock(&ar->conf_mutex);
>> +
>> + if (ar->state != ATH10K_STATE_UTF) {
>> + ret = EHOSTDOWN;
>
> Shouldn't this be a negative number?
Fixed.
> Also ath10k_tm_cmd_utf_stop() uses -ENETDOWN for this case.
I changed this to -ENETDOWN also.
--
Kalle Valo
More information about the ath10k
mailing list