wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Brazil (BR) on 6GHz
Marcos Alano
marcoshalano at gmail.com
Thu Jun 26 02:30:40 PDT 2025
On 26/06/2025 06:23, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hi,
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 4:37 PM Marcos Alano <marcoshalano at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 26/06/2025 05:15, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 9:23 AM Marcos Alano <marcoshalano at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> The rules for Brazil were based on this normative
>>>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2017/936-resolucao-680,
>>>> as mentioned in the comments of the entry.
>>>>
>>>> This January came out a newer normative
>>>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772,
>>>>
>>>> It allows 6GHz frequencies, so the line:
>>>> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR, NO-IR
>>>> Should change for, at least:
>>>> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR
>>>> The removal of NO-IR is important, since routers Wi-Fi 6E and 7 don't
>>>> work because of this outdated rule based on an outdated normative.
>>>
>>> Those are very large documents. Could you help point out which sections
>>> or comments apply to your argument?
>>
>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/atos-de-requisitos-tecnicos-de-gestao-do-espectro/2024/1920-ato-915:
>> in the items IX.4 and IX.5 mentions the 6GHz frequency.
>
> This only covers point-to-point usage. You would need to modify the rules
> and add the PTP flag. Likely not what you actually want.
>
>> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772:
>> You can search for "5925-6700" to check how the allocation is done.
>> It mentions satellites, so that's why I set indoors, but maybe you
>> understand that is not necessary.
>
> This only gives the band allocation, not the requirements for each use.
> Also, satellite communication is a different use category. We should look
> for WiFi or RLAN, or perhaps "comunicação multimídia".
>
> The requirements I were able to find are:
>
> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/atos-de-certificacao-de-produtos/2021/1510-ato-1306
>
I understand. The problem is: with NO-IR set, we can't configure an AP,
since the AP is the initial radiator.
So we just could remove NO-IR so we can create and use APs in this range?
In this case, I will create a v3 of the patch that just removes NO-IR
and keeps the documentation links as is.
Please let me know what you think.
Marcos.
> ChenYu
>
>> Marcos.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> ChenYu
>>>
>>>> I'm no lawyer, so please if you see something different, like more
>>>> granular control in the allowed frequencies, please let us know.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> --
>>>> Marcos Alano
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> Marcos Alano
>>
--
Marcos Alano
More information about the wireless-regdb
mailing list