wireless-regdb: Update regulatory rules for Brazil (BR) on 6GHz

[Chen-Yu Tsai]

Hi,

On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 4:37 PM Marcos Alano <marcoshalano at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 26/06/2025 05:15, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 2, 2025 at 9:23 AM Marcos Alano <marcoshalano at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> The rules for Brazil were based on this normative
> >> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2017/936-resolucao-680,
> >> as mentioned in the comments of the entry.
> >>
> >> This January came out a newer normative
> >> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772,
> >>
> >> It allows 6GHz frequencies, so the line:
> >> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR, NO-IR
> >> Should change for, at least:
> >> (5925 - 7125 @ 320), (12), NO-OUTDOOR
> >> The removal of NO-IR is important, since routers Wi-Fi 6E and 7 don't
> >> work because of this outdated rule based on an outdated normative.
> >
> > Those are very large documents. Could you help point out which sections
> > or comments apply to your argument?
>
> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/atos-de-requisitos-tecnicos-de-gestao-do-espectro/2024/1920-ato-915:
> in the items IX.4 and IX.5 mentions the 6GHz frequency.

This only covers point-to-point usage. You would need to modify the rules
and add the PTP flag. Likely not what you actually want.

> https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes/2025/2001-resolucao-772:
> You can search for "5925-6700" to check how the allocation is done.
> It mentions satellites, so that's why I set indoors, but maybe you
> understand that is not necessary.

This only gives the band allocation, not the requirements for each use.
Also, satellite communication is a different use category. We should look
for WiFi or RLAN, or perhaps "comunicação multimídia".

The requirements I were able to find are:

https://informacoes.anatel.gov.br/legislacao/atos-de-certificacao-de-produtos/2021/1510-ato-1306

ChenYu

> Marcos.
>
>
> >
> > Thanks
> > ChenYu
> >
> >> I'm no lawyer, so please if you see something different, like more
> >> granular control in the allowed frequencies, please let us know.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> --
> >> Marcos Alano
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> Marcos Alano
>