[PATCH 4/5] wcn3620: use new response format for wcn3620 trigger_ba

[fengwei.yin]

On 2015/11/20 9:52, Bob Copeland wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 20, 2015 at 09:40:30AM +0800, fengwei.yin wrote:
>> Actually, this patch was using the v1 and DragonBoard needs v2 for trigger_ba.
>> And I want to know whether the change from Andy could work on the platform
>> which is using v1.
>>
>> Can you try this change on your platform? Thanks.
>
> I'm not sure I understand -- if you look at the right side of the diff
> for the patch "wcn36xx: Parse trigger_ba response properly", it is changing
> wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check() to wcn36xx_smd_trigger_ba_rsp(), whose
> definition is the same as wcn36xx_smd_rsp_station_check_v2() as far as I can
> tell.  Or am I missing something?
>
Yes. Exactly. So your platform is using the v2 format as well. We may not need
to care the v1 format too much. Thanks.

Regards
Yin, Fengwei