[PATCH 4/5] wcn3620: use new response format for wcn3620 trigger_ba

[Bjorn Andersson]

On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 7:40 AM, Bob Copeland <me at bobcopeland.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 05:02:41AM -0500, Yin, Fengwei wrote:
>> From: Andy Green <andy.green at linaro.org>
>>
>> From: Andy Green <andy.green at linaro.org>
>>
>> On wcn3620, firmware response to trigger_ba uses the new, larger
>> "v2" format
>
>> -     ret = wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check(wcn->hal_buf, wcn->hal_rsp_len);
>> +     ret = wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2(wcn, wcn->hal_buf,
>> +                                             wcn->hal_rsp_len);
>
> It's unclear from the changelog -- is it safe to call
> wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2 on the 3660/3680 as well?
>
> Is wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check() still needed?
>

I had to introduce this on one of my 3680 devices recently to silence
the error described originally by Andy. So it not only seems safe but
seems required. But still, based on how the code was written this
doesn't seem to be the case on all versions of the firmware or all
chips(?)

Regards,
Bjorn