[PATCH 4/5] wcn3620: use new response format for wcn3620 trigger_ba

[Bob Copeland]

On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 05:02:41AM -0500, Yin, Fengwei wrote:
> From: Andy Green <andy.green at linaro.org>
> 
> From: Andy Green <andy.green at linaro.org>
> 
> On wcn3620, firmware response to trigger_ba uses the new, larger
> "v2" format

> -	ret = wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check(wcn->hal_buf, wcn->hal_rsp_len);
> +	ret = wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2(wcn, wcn->hal_buf,
> +						wcn->hal_rsp_len);

It's unclear from the changelog -- is it safe to call
wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2 on the 3660/3680 as well?

Is wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check() still needed?

-- 
Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/