[PATCH 4/5] wcn3620: use new response format for wcn3620 trigger_ba
Bob Copeland
me at bobcopeland.com
Mon Nov 9 07:40:40 PST 2015
On Mon, Nov 09, 2015 at 05:02:41AM -0500, Yin, Fengwei wrote:
> From: Andy Green <andy.green at linaro.org>
>
> From: Andy Green <andy.green at linaro.org>
>
> On wcn3620, firmware response to trigger_ba uses the new, larger
> "v2" format
> - ret = wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check(wcn->hal_buf, wcn->hal_rsp_len);
> + ret = wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2(wcn, wcn->hal_buf,
> + wcn->hal_rsp_len);
It's unclear from the changelog -- is it safe to call
wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check_v2 on the 3660/3680 as well?
Is wcn36xx_smd_rsp_status_check() still needed?
--
Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/
More information about the wcn36xx
mailing list