BD and HT Aggregation

Eugene Krasnikov k.eugene.e at gmail.com
Wed Oct 16 14:52:15 EDT 2013


my assumption for bullet number 2 is that bss index is wrong, but that
is just a speculation:) Let me know if you find something.

On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:44 PM, Eugene Krasnikov <k.eugene.e at gmail.com> wrote:
> I would suggest to concentrate on bullet 2 first. Second bullet is
> much easier to fix!
>
> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Chun-Yeow Yeoh
> <yeohchunyeow at cozybit.com> wrote:
>>> 1) When you say "The only different, I saw from prima"  you mean you
>>> saw in source code? Try to run prima driver and dump BD and then
>>> compare wcn36xx and prima logs.
>> Yes, referring source code. Ok I try this first.
>>
>> ----
>> Chun-Yeow
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Eugene Krasnikov <k.eugene.e at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 1) When you say "The only different, I saw from prima"  you mean you
>>> saw in source code? Try to run prima driver and dump BD and then
>>> compare wcn36xx and prima logs.
>>> 2) If STA mode fails then there is a regression! I would suggest first
>>> to fix this problem and then come back to bullet number 1.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 7:28 PM, Chun-Yeow Yeoh
>>> <yeohchunyeow at cozybit.com> wrote:
>>>>> 1) Try it first;) i am confident that TX agg should work with prim
>>>> The only different, I saw from prima is that the writing of DXE
>>>> register, like marking the EOP and INT. But EOP is representing end of
>>>> packet (a MPDU frame), right?
>>>>
>>>>> 2) Hmm.. is it failing in STA mode as well? if yes then it's regression.
>>>> Yes, STA mode also failed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> Eugene
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Eugene



-- 
Best regards,
Eugene



More information about the wcn36xx mailing list