IMPS / Idle mode power save

Eugene Krasnikov k.eugene.e at gmail.com
Tue Jun 11 09:34:05 EDT 2013


Since IMPS does not save power I suggest not to bring it into the
master branch. But not to loose you efforts Olof please keep it on a
separate branch. Maybe one day we will change our mind;)

2013/6/10 Pontus Fuchs <pontus.fuchs at gmail.com>:
> On 2013-06-10 11:04, Olof Johansson wrote:
>
>> My guess is that since the fw knows whether it's connected or not by
>> itself the IMPS op is no longer needed.
>>
>> Any thoughts or comments on this or my results?
>>
>> Otherwise I think we can skip implementing the imps functionality
>> which is nice. :)
>
>
> Nice work!
>
> //Pontus
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wcn36xx mailing list
> wcn36xx at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/wcn36xx



-- 
Best regards,
Eugene



More information about the wcn36xx mailing list