IMPS / Idle mode power save

Pontus Fuchs pontus.fuchs at gmail.com
Mon Jun 10 06:17:29 EDT 2013


On 2013-06-10 11:04, Olof Johansson wrote:

> My guess is that since the fw knows whether it's connected or not by
> itself the IMPS op is no longer needed.
>
> Any thoughts or comments on this or my results?
>
> Otherwise I think we can skip implementing the imps functionality
> which is nice. :)

Nice work!

//Pontus




More information about the wcn36xx mailing list