[RFC] Add the BMPS timer to enter/exit BMPS mode when running

Eugene Krasnikov k.eugene.e at gmail.com
Thu Jul 25 06:50:58 EDT 2013


Hi Yanbo,

Do you know starting which FW version data flow monitoring is moved to
FW? I want just to be sure that after bringing this patch in it will
not break tput on my device.

2013/7/24 Eugene Krasnikov <k.eugene.e at gmail.com>:
> Just FYI in future we will need to implement BSS_CHANGED_PS so upper
> layers can control whether driver can shut down radio or not. E.g.
> today during DHCP DORA upper layers will notify bottom half to exit
> bmps using BSS_CHANGED_PS flag.
>
> 2013/7/24 Eugene Krasnikov <k.eugene.e at gmail.com>:
>> Do you know from which FW version data flow monitor was moved to FW?
>> Because i have an old FW version so I will need it in driver anyway.
>>
>> 2013/7/24 YanBo <dreamfly281 at gmail.com>:
>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Eugene Krasnikov <k.eugene.e at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> +static void wcn36xx_pmc_bmps_measure_work(struct work_struct *work)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +       struct wcn36xx *wcn = container_of(work, struct wcn36xx,
>>>>> +                                          bmps_work.work);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       /* Enter or Exit BMPS depend on the currently condition */
>>>>> +       wcn36xx_pmc_enter_bmps_state(wcn);
>>>>> +       wcn36xx_pmc_exit_bmps_state(wcn);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +       ieee80211_queue_delayed_work(wcn->hw, &wcn->bmps_work,
>>>>> +                                    msecs_to_jiffies(BMPS_MEASURE_TIMER_DEFAULT));
>>>>> +}
>>>>
>>>> What is the purpose to queue the work again? Does it mean that wcn36xx
>>>> will enter and exit bmps every BMPS_MEASURE_TIMER_DEFAULT seconds?
>>> it will make sure the work queue running like a timer, cause for every
>>> time period, they may be some event will
>>> trigger the enter full power mode event, the enter/exit bmps function
>>> used to check whether the condition is triggered or not.
>>>>
>>>> I also thought you gonna implement a patch that will check if there is
>>>> a high data flow then exit bmps . But apparently this patch is not
>>>> doing this.
>>>>
>>>
>>> That is also I intended to implemented, but as I get the newest
>>> update, the monitor high/lower data flow function has been moved into
>>> firmware,
>>> the firmware will do such work, and in the host driver, there is still
>>> some scenario need be protected to avoid into BMPS, like currently the
>>> DHCP process(to be confirm?) some BTC cases. in such case, they can
>>> all the  wcn36xx_vote_enter_full_power to protect such scenario
>>>>
>>>> 2013/7/24 Olof Johansson <dev at skyshaper.net>:
>>>>> Hello Yanbo.
>>>>>
>>>>> No, I mean this parameter:
>>>>> https://www.codeaurora.org/cgit/quic/la/platform/vendor/qcom-opensource/wlan/prima/tree/firmware_bin/WCNSS_qcom_cfg.ini?h=b2g/jb_mr1_rb2.17#n339
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers
>>>>> --
>>>>> Olof
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 4:15 AM, YanBo <dreamfly281 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> Hi Olof,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What the specify configuration name you mentioned, do you mean
>>>>>> dynamic_dtim? if so, it is used for dynamic adjust the
>>>>>> DTIM value but not conflict with BMPS  timer
>>>>>>
>>>>>> BR /Yanbo
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 12:59 AM, Olof Johansson <dev at skyshaper.net> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Eugene Krasnikov <k.eugene.e at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> @Olof: I am not sure  what do you mean under DYNAMIC_PS but there is
>>>>>>>> one configuration parameters that is responsible for how time between
>>>>>>>> last data packet received from AP and NULL packet sent from STA to AP
>>>>>>>> with PS bit set.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is a CFG parameter (sent at start or update config smd packets)
>>>>>>> which is called DYNAMIC_PS which corresponds to the value of data
>>>>>>> inactivity timeout in the prima .ini file. This value adjusts how long
>>>>>>> the firmware is staying awake after sending or receiving a packet
>>>>>>> before going back to BMPS mode. This value we adjusted several times
>>>>>>> to trim throughput as well as btcoex issues.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> At least that is how it was explained to me by QC :)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Olof
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Eugene
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best regards,
>> Eugene
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Eugene



-- 
Best regards,
Eugene



More information about the wcn36xx mailing list