speedtch usbatm.h,1.4,1.5 usbatm2.c,1.13,1.14
rkagan at mail.ru
Sat Feb 12 10:30:35 EST 2005
On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 03:59:30PM +0100, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Maybe usbatm should take a module reference to the driver, and drop it
> in udsl_destroy_instance?
AFAICS 2.6.10 usb_atm doesn't call any code from the only in-tree
user, speedtch. So at worst it'll leak a speedtch_instance_data on
every disconnect, and there's no need to grab a module reference.
More information about the Usbatm