Adding new ARC platforms (was Re: Handling stub code for new platforms)
Vineet Gupta
vgupta at synopsys.com
Thu Aug 10 18:07:00 PDT 2017
Hi Alexandru,
On 08/11/2017 12:58 AM, Alexandru Gagniuc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Looking under arch/arc, I see the current way is to add a plat-[socname] for each
> new SoC. However, it seems that plat-sim, and plat-tb10x are just place-holders
> for the compatible bindings.
>
> I was going to do the same for plat-anarion, which required an early boot
> workaround. However, with Alexey's INTC patch, this workaround is no longer
> required, so plat-anarion would become just another stub.
>
> I don't like the idea of adding dead code whenever a new platform arrives. My
> thought is to merge these into a plat-generic, and add the following two
> compatible bindings:
> * "snps,arccompact-generic"
> * "snps,arcv2-generic"
> Keep the existing bindings for compatibility reasons, but require all new
> platforms that don't need boot stubs to use one of the generic .compatible
> bindings. Do you agree with the plan?
Your proposal is reasonable but I'd still prefer the explicit platform/soC binding
for calling out the various arc based platforms if nothing else !
However the boilerplate code can be pretty minimal ! If the platform is simple
enough, no need for any new Kconfig entries. I've already eliminated
CONFIG_ARC_PLAT_SIM (look at my #for-curr in kernel.org repo / linux-next)
So you just need to
1. create plat-xxx/{Makefile, platform.c} and a simple board description in latter.
2. And add this platform unconditionally to arch/arc/Makefile
Does that work for you ?
-Vineet
More information about the linux-snps-arc
mailing list