[PATCH 1/6] bcm2835-gpio-exp: Driver for GPIO expander via mailbox service

Stefan Wahren stefan.wahren at i2se.com
Sat Mar 18 06:23:23 PDT 2017


> Michael Zoran <mzoran at crowfest.net> hat am 17. März 2017 um 16:22 geschrieben:
> 
> 
> From: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson at raspberrypi.org>
> 
> Pi3 and Compute Module 3 have a GPIO expander that the
> VPU communicates with.
> There is a mailbox service that now allows control of this
> expander, so add a kernel driver that can make use of it.
> 
> Pwr_led node added to device-tree for Pi3.

Looks like debris

> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson at raspberrypi.org>
> 
> Stripped off changes to Makefile and Kconfig
> Also stripped off changes to raspberrypi-firmware.h
> Moved to drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-firmware-gpio
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Zoran <mzoran at crowfest.net>
> ---
>  .../bcm2835-firmware-gpio/gpio-bcm-exp.c           | 256 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 256 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-firmware-gpio/gpio-bcm-exp.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-firmware-gpio/gpio-bcm-exp.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-firmware-gpio/gpio-bcm-exp.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..681a91492d4c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/bcm2835-firmware-gpio/gpio-bcm-exp.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,256 @@
> +/*
> + *  Broadcom expander GPIO driver
> + *
> + *  Uses the firmware mailbox service to communicate with the
> + *  GPIO expander on the VPU.
> + *
> + *  Copyright (C) 2017 Raspberry Pi Trading Ltd.
> + *
> + *  Author: Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson at raspberrypi.org>
> + *  Based on gpio-bcm-virt.c by Dom Cobley <popcornmix at gmail.com>
> + *
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
> + * the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
> + * (at your option) any later version.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/err.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> +#include <soc/bcm2835/raspberrypi-firmware.h>
> +
> +#define MODULE_NAME "brcmexp-gpio"
> +#define NUM_GPIO 8
> +
> +struct brcmexp_gpio {
> +	struct gpio_chip gc;
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	struct rpi_firmware *fw;
> +};
> +
> +struct gpio_set_config {
> +	u32 gpio, direction, polarity, term_en, term_pull_up, state;

Please one line per member

> +};
> +
> +struct gpio_get_config {
> +	u32 gpio, direction, polarity, term_en, term_pull_up;

ditto

> +};
> +
> +struct gpio_get_set_state {
> +	u32 gpio, state;

ditto

> +};
> +
> +static int brcmexp_gpio_get_polarity(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off)
> +{
> +	struct brcmexp_gpio *gpio;
> +	struct gpio_get_config get;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	gpio = container_of(gc, struct brcmexp_gpio, gc);
> +
> +	get.gpio = off + gpio->gc.base;	/* GPIO to update */
> +
> +	ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_GPIO_CONFIG,
> +				    &get, sizeof(get));

This define comes from patch 2 which should breaks the build after apply only this patch :-(

> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(gpio->dev,
> +			"Failed to get GPIO %u config (%d)\n", off, ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +	return get.polarity;
> +}
> +
> +static int brcmexp_gpio_dir_in(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off)
> +{
> +	struct brcmexp_gpio *gpio;
> +	struct gpio_set_config set_in;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	gpio = container_of(gc, struct brcmexp_gpio, gc);
> +
> +	set_in.gpio = off + gpio->gc.base;	/* GPIO to update */
> +	set_in.direction = 0;		/* Input */

I think a self explaining define would be better.

> +	set_in.polarity = brcmexp_gpio_get_polarity(gc, off);
> +					/* Retain existing setting */
> +	set_in.term_en = 0;		/* termination disabled */
> +	set_in.term_pull_up = 0;	/* n/a as termination disabled */
> +	set_in.state = 0;		/* n/a as configured as an input */
> +
> +	ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_GPIO_CONFIG,
> +				    &set_in, sizeof(set_in));
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(gpio->dev,
> +			"Failed to set GPIO %u to input (%d)\n",
> +			off, ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int brcmexp_gpio_dir_out(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off, int val)
> +{
> +	struct brcmexp_gpio *gpio;
> +	struct gpio_set_config set_out;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	gpio = container_of(gc, struct brcmexp_gpio, gc);
> +
> +	set_out.gpio = off + gpio->gc.base;	/* GPIO to update */
> +	set_out.direction = 1;		/* Output */
> +	set_out.polarity = brcmexp_gpio_get_polarity(gc, off);
> +					/* Retain existing setting */
> +	set_out.term_en = 0;		/* n/a as an output */
> +	set_out.term_pull_up = 0;	/* n/a as termination disabled */
> +	set_out.state = val;		/* Output state */
> +
> +	ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_GPIO_CONFIG,
> +				    &set_out, sizeof(set_out));
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(gpio->dev,
> +			"Failed to set GPIO %u to output (%d)\n", off, ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int brcmexp_gpio_get_direction(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off)
> +{
> +	struct brcmexp_gpio *gpio;
> +	struct gpio_get_config get;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	gpio = container_of(gc, struct brcmexp_gpio, gc);
> +
> +	get.gpio = off + gpio->gc.base;	/* GPIO to update */
> +
> +	ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_GPIO_CONFIG,
> +				    &get, sizeof(get));
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(gpio->dev,
> +			"Failed to get GPIO %u config (%d)\n", off, ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +	return get.direction ? GPIOF_DIR_OUT : GPIOF_DIR_IN;
> +}
> +
> +static int brcmexp_gpio_get(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off)
> +{
> +	struct brcmexp_gpio *gpio;
> +	struct gpio_get_set_state get;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	gpio = container_of(gc, struct brcmexp_gpio, gc);
> +
> +	get.gpio = off + gpio->gc.base;	/* GPIO to update */
> +	get.state = 0;		/* storage for returned value */
> +
> +	ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_GET_GPIO_STATE,
> +					 &get, sizeof(get));
> +	if (ret) {
> +		dev_err(gpio->dev,
> +			"Failed to get GPIO %u state (%d)\n", off, ret);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +	return !!get.state;
> +}
> +
> +static void brcmexp_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *gc, unsigned int off, int val)
> +{
> +	struct brcmexp_gpio *gpio;
> +	struct gpio_get_set_state set;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	gpio = container_of(gc, struct brcmexp_gpio, gc);
> +
> +	off += gpio->gc.base;
> +
> +	set.gpio = off + gpio->gc.base;	/* GPIO to update */
> +	set.state = val;	/* Output state */
> +
> +	ret = rpi_firmware_property(gpio->fw, RPI_FIRMWARE_SET_GPIO_STATE,
> +					 &set, sizeof(set));
> +	if (ret)
> +		dev_err(gpio->dev,
> +			"Failed to set GPIO %u state (%d)\n", off, ret);
> +}
> +
> +static int brcmexp_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	int err = 0;
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> +	struct device_node *fw_node;
> +	struct rpi_firmware *fw;
> +	struct brcmexp_gpio *ucb;

The variable name isn't good.

> +
> +	fw_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "firmware", 0);
> +	if (!fw_node) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "Missing firmware node\n");
> +		return -ENOENT;
> +	}
> +
> +	fw = rpi_firmware_get(fw_node);
> +	if (!fw)
> +		return -EPROBE_DEFER;
> +
> +	ucb = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ucb), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!ucb)
> +		return -EINVAL;

ENOMEM ?

> +
> +	ucb->fw = fw;
> +	ucb->dev = dev;
> +	ucb->gc.label = MODULE_NAME;
> +	ucb->gc.owner = THIS_MODULE;
> +	ucb->gc.of_node = np;
> +	ucb->gc.base = 128;
> +	ucb->gc.ngpio = NUM_GPIO;
> +
> +	ucb->gc.direction_input = brcmexp_gpio_dir_in;
> +	ucb->gc.direction_output = brcmexp_gpio_dir_out;
> +	ucb->gc.get_direction = brcmexp_gpio_get_direction;
> +	ucb->gc.get = brcmexp_gpio_get;
> +	ucb->gc.set = brcmexp_gpio_set;
> +	ucb->gc.can_sleep = true;
> +
> +	err = gpiochip_add(&ucb->gc);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;

Please use devm_gpiochip_add_data() here as suggested by Linus [1] then all the container_of() could be replaced by gpiochip_get_data().

[1] - https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9339859/

> +
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ucb);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int brcmexp_gpio_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct brcmexp_gpio *ucb = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
> +
> +	gpiochip_remove(&ucb->gc);
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id __maybe_unused brcmexp_gpio_ids[] = {

__maybe_unused is unnecessary

> +	{ .compatible = "brcm,bcm2835-expgpio" },
> +	{ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, brcmexp_gpio_ids);
> +
> +static struct platform_driver brcmexp_gpio_driver = {
> +	.driver	= {
> +		.name		= MODULE_NAME,
> +		.owner		= THIS_MODULE,

Please drop this

> +		.of_match_table	= of_match_ptr(brcmexp_gpio_ids),
> +	},
> +	.probe	= brcmexp_gpio_probe,
> +	.remove	= brcmexp_gpio_remove,
> +};
> +module_platform_driver(brcmexp_gpio_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Dave Stevenson <dave.stevenson at raspberrypi.org>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("brcm-exp GPIO driver");
> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:brcmexp-gpio");
> -- 
> 2.11.0
>



More information about the linux-rpi-kernel mailing list