julia.lawall at lip6.fr
Fri Mar 17 09:55:42 PDT 2017
On Fri, 17 Mar 2017, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > Hah! That's the joy of being a maintainer of a driver in staging. Even
> > if you filter out outreachy, you are going to get a lot of "basic
> > mistakes" and other type patches cc:ed to you.
> > I strongly suggest, that if you all don't like this type of stuff,
> > either:
> > - work to get the code out of staging as soon as possible (i.e.
> > send me coding style fixes for everything right now, and then
> > fix up the rest of the stuff.)
> > - take yourself off the maintainer list for this code.
> > It's your choice, outreachy right now is a lot of patches, but again,
> > it's not going to keep you from getting the "basic" stuff sent to you
> > in ways that is totally wrong.
> Could we get these trivial patches off the lkml? Yes, lkml already has
> a lot of traffic, but no, this is not useful :-(.
The outreachy instructions say to use the -nol argument to
get_maintainers, which would prevent them from being sent to any mailing
list. However others thought that all patches should be sent to mailing
lists, and so I haven't enforced anything for people who have omitted
-nol. However I have tried to remove bcm maintainers from CC lists on
replies and reminded people not to send you patches,
> (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
> (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
More information about the linux-rpi-kernel