[alsa-devel] [PATCH 3/4] sound: arm: Add build system for bcm2835-analog-audio driver.
Michael Zoran
mzoran at crowfest.net
Tue Mar 14 02:53:59 PDT 2017
On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 10:13 +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Am 14.03.2017 um 09:58 schrieb Michael Zoran:
> > On Tue, 2017-03-14 at 15:15 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> > > Hi Michael,
> > >
> > > [auto build test ERROR on sound/for-next]
> > > [also build test ERROR on v4.11-rc2 next-20170310]
> > > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a
> > > note to help improve the system]
> > >
> > > url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Michael-Zoran/dt
> > > -bin
> > > dings-Document-the-dmas-and-dma-names-properties-for-bcm2835-
> > > analog-
> > > audio/20170314-091035
> > > base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sou
> > > nd.g
> > > it for-next
> > > config: arm64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
> > > compiler: aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705
> > > reproduce:
> > > wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/01org/lkp-tests/ma
> > > ster
> > > /sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> > > chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> > > # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> > > make.cross ARCH=arm64
> > >
> > > All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> > >
> > > /tmp/ccNU8kQ5.s: Assembler messages:
> > > > > /tmp/ccNU8kQ5.s:1411: Error: unknown mnemonic `ldmia' --
> > > > > `ldmia
> > > > > x26,{r0,r1,r2,r3}'
> > > > > /tmp/ccNU8kQ5.s:1412: Error: unknown mnemonic `stmia' --
> > > > > `stmia
> > > > > x19!,{r0,r1,r2,r3}'
> > > > > /tmp/ccNU8kQ5.s:1618: Error: unknown mnemonic `ldmia' --
> > > > > `ldmia
> > > > > x19!,{r0,r1,r2,r3}'
> > > > > /tmp/ccNU8kQ5.s:1619: Error: unknown mnemonic `stmia' --
> > > > > `stmia
> > > > > x26,{r0,r1,r2,r3}'
> > >
> > > ---
> > > 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source
> > > Technology Center
> > > https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel
> > > Corporation
> >
> > I'm a bit confused here. Why I'm I seeing assembly instruction
> > build
> > errors when the mail points to a DT binding document change?
> >
> >
>
> The email subject doesn't refer to a DT binding.
>
> I assume it's your change to enable ARM64 for all SND_ARM drivers,
> which
> aren't aware of that.
OK, that makes sense now. Should I just submit another change adding a
depends on ARM to the 1 or 2 other drivers in the directory?
More information about the linux-rpi-kernel
mailing list