[PATCH 1/4] spi: bcm2835aux: fix bitmask defines

[Stephan Olbrich]

Hi Stefan

Am Tuesday 09 February 2016, 20:54:03 schrieb Stefan Wahren:
> Hi Stephan,
> 
> Am 09.02.2016 um 19:10 schrieb stephanolbrich at gmx.de:
> > From: Stephan Olbrich <stephanolbrich at gmx.de>
> > 
> > The bitmasks for txempty and idle interrupts were interchanged.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephan Olbrich <stephanolbrich at gmx.de>
> > ---
> > 
> >   drivers/spi/spi-bcm2835aux.c | 4 ++--
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-bcm2835aux.c b/drivers/spi/spi-bcm2835aux.c
> > index 7de6f84..ecc73c0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/spi/spi-bcm2835aux.c
> > +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-bcm2835aux.c
> > @@ -73,8 +73,8 @@
> > 
> >   /* Bitfields in CNTL1 */
> >   #define BCM2835_AUX_SPI_CNTL1_CSHIGH	0x00000700
> > 
> > -#define BCM2835_AUX_SPI_CNTL1_IDLE	0x00000080
> > -#define BCM2835_AUX_SPI_CNTL1_TXEMPTY	0x00000040
> 
> according to a comment in this file these values are from
> brcm_usrlib/dag/vmcsx/vcinclude/bcm2708_chip/aux_io.h.
> 
> So you want to say that at least these 2 are wrong and you took the
> values from BCM2835-ARM-Peripherals.pdf [1]?
> 
> I think it's worth to mention it.

Actually I stumbled across this while writing the second patch in this series 
and the wrong interrupt got disabled but BCM2835-ARM-Peripherals.pdf did 
confirm my findings.
As Mark has already applied this patch I can't add any comment to it anymore, 
right?

> [1] -
> https://www.raspberrypi.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/BCM2835-ARM-Periphera
> ls.pdf
> > +#define BCM2835_AUX_SPI_CNTL1_TXEMPTY	0x00000080
> > +#define BCM2835_AUX_SPI_CNTL1_IDLE	0x00000040
> > 
> >   #define BCM2835_AUX_SPI_CNTL1_MSBF_IN	0x00000002
> >   #define BCM2835_AUX_SPI_CNTL1_KEEP_IN	0x00000001
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-rpi-kernel mailing list
> linux-rpi-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rpi-kernel