[RESEND][PATCH v2] dmaengine: bcm2835: Add slave dma support
Martin Sperl
kernel at martin.sperl.org
Thu Dec 17 23:27:52 PST 2015
> On 18.12.2015, at 07:05, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul at intel.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 07:11:48PM +0100, Martin Sperl wrote:
>
>> +
>> + /* Setup addresses */
>> + if (d->dir == DMA_DEV_TO_MEM) {
>> + control_block->info = BCM2835_DMA_D_INC |
>> + BCM2835_DMA_D_WIDTH |
>> + BCM2835_DMA_S_DREQ;
>> + control_block->src = dev_addr;
>> + control_block->dst = addr + (dma_addr_t)j;
>> + } else {
>> + control_block->info = BCM2835_DMA_S_INC |
>> + BCM2835_DMA_S_WIDTH |
>> + BCM2835_DMA_D_DREQ;
>> + control_block->src = addr + (dma_addr_t)j;
>> + control_block->dst = dev_addr;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* Common part */
>> + control_block->info |=
>> + BCM2835_DMA_WAITS(BCM2835_DMA_WAIT_CYCLES);
>> + control_block->info |= BCM2835_DMA_WAIT_RESP;
>> +
>> + /* Enable */
>> + if (i == sg_len - 1 && len - j <= max_size)
>> + control_block->info |= BCM2835_DMA_INT_EN;
>> +
>> + /* Setup synchronization */
>> + if (sync_type)
>> + control_block->info |= sync_type;
>> +
>> + /* Setup DREQ channel */
>> + if (c->dreq)
>> + control_block->info |=
>> + BCM2835_DMA_PER_MAP(c->dreq);
>> +
>> + /* Length of a frame */
>> + control_block->length = min(len - j, max_size);
>> + d->size += control_block->length;
>> +
>> + if (i < sg_len - 1 || len - j > max_size) {
>> + /* Next block is the next frame. */
>> + control_block->next =
>> + d->control_block_base_phys +
>> + sizeof(struct bcm2835_dma_cb) *
>> + (i + split_cnt + 1);
>> + } else {
>> + /* Next block is empty. */
>> + control_block->next = 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + if (len - j > max_size)
>> + split_cnt++;
>
> Most of this part is common with the cyclic and seems copy paste. Can we
> use common routine to do common work please
I agree - can have a look - the big question is: how would I document the
individual changes by Gellert Weisz and myself correctly?
* just a single patch with an attribution tag (which?) or just a commit message?
* Patchset with 2 patches: the original by Gellert Weisz (this)
plus the modification to consolidate the code above?
Thanks,
Martin
More information about the linux-rpi-kernel
mailing list