[PATCH v2] ARM: bcm2835: add device tree for Raspberry Pi model B+
swarren at wwwdotorg.org
Wed Nov 19 09:08:03 PST 2014
On 11/19/2014 08:29 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>> The model B and B+ differ in the GPIO lines for ACT and PWR leds, and the
>> I2S interface.
>> Signed-off-by: Matthias Klein <matthias.klein at linux.com>
>> Changes in v2:
>> - move the common parts between the B and B+ model into the new bcm2835-rpi.dtsi file
>> - add the I2S signals to the B+ file which fix the problem that USB is not working
>> with the current bcm2835-rpi-b.dts file on the B+.
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 +
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-b-plus.dts | 30 +++++++++++++++++++
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-b.dts | 46 ++--------------------------
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi | 51 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 4 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 43 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi-b-plus.dts
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/bcm2835-rpi.dtsi
> Sorry for the delay. I thought RPi world was exceptionally quiet, but
> in fact I had issues with my newly setup mailbox and filters. All
> rectified now in any case.
> It might be worth noting that this will not likely land in v3.19, as
> we are one step removed from Linus (i.e. via ARM SoC) and they usually
> like to have pull-requests in by -rc5. Unless anyone stamps their
> feet, I'll be sending this no sooner than v3.20.
-rc6 is the usual cut-off, and the arm-soc maintainers have said that's
not always a very strict cut-off; it depends on how invasive the patch
is (which this isn't) and whether the patch has been in linux-next
already before getting into arm-soc (and linux-rpi.git's for-next branch
is in linux-next).
More information about the linux-rpi-kernel