[PATCH 7/7] iommu/riscv: Add NAPOT range invalidation support
Andrew Jones
andrew.jones at oss.qualcomm.com
Tue May 5 15:47:10 PDT 2026
On Fri, Apr 10, 2026 at 12:57:08PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Use the RISC-V IOMMU Address Range Invalidation extension
> (capabilities.S, spec section 9.3) to invalidate an IOVA range with
> a single IOTINVAL.VMA command using NAPOT-encoded addressing.
>
> One iommu_iotlb_gather maps to one NAPOT invalidation command. The
> smallest power-of-two aligned range covering the gather is used since
> over-invalidation is always safe.
>
> S and NL seem to be orthogonal in the spec, so if NL is not
> supported then global invalidation is probably always going to happen
> as wiping a large range without a table change is not common.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at nvidia.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu-bits.h | 17 +++++++++++++
> drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu-bits.h b/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu-bits.h
> index f01b49ac815586..32b3ad3ac9ae59 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu-bits.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/riscv/iommu-bits.h
> @@ -64,6 +64,7 @@
> #define RISCV_IOMMU_CAPABILITIES_PD17 BIT_ULL(39)
> #define RISCV_IOMMU_CAPABILITIES_PD20 BIT_ULL(40)
> #define RISCV_IOMMU_CAPABILITIES_NL BIT_ULL(42)
> +#define RISCV_IOMMU_CAPABILITIES_S BIT_ULL(43)
>
> /**
> * enum riscv_iommu_igs_settings - Interrupt Generation Support Settings
> @@ -475,6 +476,7 @@ struct riscv_iommu_command {
> #define RISCV_IOMMU_CMD_IOTINVAL_GV BIT_ULL(33)
> #define RISCV_IOMMU_CMD_IOTINVAL_GSCID GENMASK_ULL(59, 44)
> #define RISCV_IOMMU_CMD_IOTINVAL_NL BIT_ULL(34)
> +#define RISCV_IOMMU_CMD_IOTINVAL_S BIT_ULL(9)
We should add a comment here that this is actually bit 73, i.e.
#define RISCV_IOMMU_CMD_IOTINVAL_S BIT_ULL(9) /* bit 73 (dword1 bit 9) */
because...
> /* dword1[61:10] is the 4K-aligned page address */
> #define RISCV_IOMMU_CMD_IOTINVAL_ADDR GENMASK_ULL(61, 10)
>
> @@ -731,6 +733,21 @@ static inline void riscv_iommu_cmd_inval_set_nl(struct riscv_iommu_command *cmd)
> cmd->dword0 |= RISCV_IOMMU_CMD_IOTINVAL_NL;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Set NAPOT-encoded address for range invalidation (S=1).
> + * sz_lg2: log2 of total range in bytes, must be >= 13 (8KiB, 2 pages).
> + * addr must be naturally aligned to 2^sz_lg2.
> + */
> +static inline void riscv_iommu_cmd_inval_set_napot(
> + struct riscv_iommu_command *cmd, u64 addr, unsigned int sz_lg2)
> +{
> + u64 pfn = addr >> 12;
> +
> + pfn |= BIT_U64(sz_lg2 - 13) - 1;
> + cmd->dword1 = FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_CMD_IOTINVAL_ADDR, pfn);
> + cmd->dword0 |= RISCV_IOMMU_CMD_IOTINVAL_AV | RISCV_IOMMU_CMD_IOTINVAL_S;
...here we're setting the wrong dword. This should be
cmd->dword1 = FIELD_PREP(RISCV_IOMMU_CMD_IOTINVAL_ADDR, pfn) |
RISCV_IOMMU_CMD_IOTINVAL_S;
cmd->dword0 |= RISCV_IOMMU_CMD_IOTINVAL_AV;
Thanks,
drew
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list