[PATCH v10 2/3] clk: canaan: Add clock driver for Canaan K230
Xukai Wang
kingxukai at zohomail.com
Thu Jan 22 03:40:29 PST 2026
On 2026/1/19 16:18, Jiayu Du wrote:
>> +
>> +K230_CLK_GATE_FORMAT(hs_hclk_src_gate,
>> + K230_HS_HCLK_SRC_GATE,
>> + 0x18, 0, 0, 0,
>> + &hs_hclk_high_src_rate.clk.hw);
> Here, you replaced hs_hclk_high_gate(in v9) with hs_hclk_high_src_rate,
I'm a bit confused, as I don't recall making these specific changes.
Looking at the code below, the only difference between v9 and v10 is
within the K230_CLK_GATE_FORMAT(hs_hclk_src_gate, ...) definition, where
the second parameter changed from 1 to 0. Everything else appears
consistent. Could you clarify which change you were referring to?
The code
in v8:
+K230_CLK_RATE_FORMAT(hs_hclk_high_src_rate, +
K230_HS_HCLK_HIGH_SRC_RATE, + 1, 1, 0, 0, + 1, 8, 0, 0x7, + 0x1C, 31,
div, 0x0, + false, 0, + &pll0_div4.hw); +
+K230_CLK_GATE_FORMAT(hs_hclk_high_gate, + K230_HS_HCLK_HIGH_GATE, +
0x18, 1, 0, 0, + &hs_hclk_high_src_rate.clk.hw); +
+K230_CLK_GATE_FORMAT(hs_hclk_src_gate, + K230_HS_HCLK_SRC_GATE, + 0x18,
1, 0, 0, + &hs_hclk_high_src_rate.clk.hw); +
+K230_CLK_RATE_FORMAT(hs_hclk_src_rate, + K230_HS_HCLK_SRC_RATE, + 1, 1,
0, 0, + 1, 8, 3, 0x7, + 0x1C, 31, div, 0x0, + false, 0, +
&hs_hclk_src_gate.clk.hw);
in v9:
+K230_CLK_RATE_FORMAT(hs_hclk_high_src_rate, +
K230_HS_HCLK_HIGH_SRC_RATE, + 1, 1, 0, 0, + 1, 8, 0, 0x7, + 0x1C, 31,
div, 0x0, + false, 0, + &pll0_div4.hw); +
+K230_CLK_GATE_FORMAT(hs_hclk_high_gate, + K230_HS_HCLK_HIGH_GATE, +
0x18, 1, 0, 0, + &hs_hclk_high_src_rate.clk.hw); +
+K230_CLK_GATE_FORMAT(hs_hclk_src_gate, + K230_HS_HCLK_SRC_GATE, + 0x18,
1, 0, 0, + &hs_hclk_high_src_rate.clk.hw); +
+K230_CLK_RATE_FORMAT(hs_hclk_src_rate, + K230_HS_HCLK_SRC_RATE, + 1, 1,
0, 0, + 1, 8, 3, 0x7, + 0x1C, 31, div, 0x0, + false, 0, +
&hs_hclk_src_gate.clk.hw); +
in v10:
+K230_CLK_RATE_FORMAT(hs_hclk_high_src_rate, +
K230_HS_HCLK_HIGH_SRC_RATE, + 1, 1, 0, 0, + 1, 8, 0, 0x7, + 0x1C, 31,
div, 0x0, + false, 0, + &pll0_div4.hw); +
+K230_CLK_GATE_FORMAT(hs_hclk_high_gate, + K230_HS_HCLK_HIGH_GATE, +
0x18, 1, 0, 0, + &hs_hclk_high_src_rate.clk.hw); +
+K230_CLK_GATE_FORMAT(hs_hclk_src_gate, + K230_HS_HCLK_SRC_GATE, + 0x18,
0, 0, 0, + &hs_hclk_high_src_rate.clk.hw); +
+K230_CLK_RATE_FORMAT(hs_hclk_src_rate, + K230_HS_HCLK_SRC_RATE, + 1, 1,
0, 0, + 1, 8, 3, 0x7, + 0x1C, 31, div, 0x0, + false, 0, +
&hs_hclk_src_gate.clk.hw);
> but after my board test, I find that when hs_hclk_high_gate is turned
> off, the mmc/sd and other high-speed subsystems can not work. So maybe
> you should not change the hs_hclk_high_gate to hs_hclk_high_src_rate.
Regarding the clock management, I recommend explicitly enabling
hs_hclk_high_gateas it will be closed by `close unused clocks`.
>
> When I used clk_ignore_unused, I saw the log as follows, while the enable
> and prepare count of hs_hclk_high_gate is zero. Here is the log:
> pll0_div4 5 5 0 400000000 0 0 50000 Y deviceless no_connection_id
> hs_hclk_high_src_rate 1 1 0 400000000 0 0 50000 Y deviceless no_connection_id
> hs_hclk_high_gate 0 0 0 400000000 0 0 50000 Y deviceless no_connection_id
> hs_hclk_src_gate 1 1 0 400000000 0 0 50000 Y deviceless no_connection_id
> hs_hclk_src_rate 4 4 0 200000000 0 0 50000 Y deviceless no_connection_id
> hs_sd0_ahb_gate 1 1 0 200000000 0 0 50000 Y 91580000.mmc ahb
> deviceless no_connection_id
> hs_sd1_ahb_gate 1 1 0 200000000 0 0 50000 Y 91581000.mmc ahb
> deviceless no_connection_id
> hs_ssi1_ahb_gate 0 0 0 200000000 0 0 50000 Y deviceless no_connection_id
> hs_ssi2_ahb_gate 0 0 0 200000000 0 0 50000 Y deviceless no_connection_id
> hs_usb0_ahb_gate 1 1 0 200000000 0 0 50000 Y 91500000.usb otg
> deviceless no_connection_id
> hs_usb1_ahb_gate 1 1 0 200000000 0 0 50000 Y 91540000.usb otg
>
> Regards,
> Jiayu Du
>> +
>> +K230_CLK_RATE_FORMAT(hs_hclk_src_rate,
>> + K230_HS_HCLK_SRC_RATE,
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list