[PATCH v2 1/3] riscv: Improve PTDUMP to show RSW with non-zero value

[Conor Dooley]

On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 09:40:25AM +0800, Yu Chien Peter Lin wrote:

> +		val = st->current_prot & pte_bits[i].mask;
> +		if (val) {
> +			if (pte_bits[i].mask == _PAGE_SOFT)
> +				sprintf(s, pte_bits[i].set, val >> 8);
> +			else
> +				sprintf(s, "%s", pte_bits[i].set);
> +		} else
> +			sprintf(s, "%s", pte_bits[i].clear);
> +

just a nit, but checkpatch in the automation is whinging that you have
forgotten to add {} around both branches if this if statement.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/attachments/20230918/7b40ab9d/attachment.sig>