[PATCH 13/20] reset: remove MODULE_LICENSE in non-modules

[Nick Alcock]

[dropped non-lists to defend innocent ears from my flaming pedantry]

On 28 Feb 2023, Conor Dooley stated:

> On Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 01:02:08PM +0000, Nick Alcock wrote:
>> Since commit 8b41fc4454e ("kbuild: create modules.builtin without
>> Makefile.modbuiltin or tristate.conf"), MODULE_LICENSE declarations
>> are used to identify modules. As a consequence, uses of the macro
>> in non-modules will cause modprobe to misidentify their containing
>> object file as a module when it is not (false positives), and modprobe
>> might succeed rather than failing with a suitable error message.
>> 
>> So remove it in the files in this commit, none of which can be built as
>> modules.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Nick Alcock <nick.alcock at oracle.com>
>> Suggested-by: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof at kernel.org>
>> Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof at kernel.org>
>> Cc: linux-modules at vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org
>> Cc: Hitomi Hasegawa <hasegawa-hitomi at fujitsu.com>
>> Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
>> Cc: Daire McNamara <daire.mcnamara at microchip.com>
>> Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel at pengutronix.de>
>> Cc: linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
>> ---
>>  drivers/reset/reset-mpfs.c | 1 -
>
> I assume your script just got confused here w/ $subject, since there's
> only a change for this specific file.

This file has had no commits since you wrote it last year, and the
subject for that commit was

    reset: add polarfire soc reset support

so, er, yes, the script used 'reset:' as a prefix, mimicking the
existing commit. I'm not sure what else it could have done.

(Regarding the rest of the subject line, I suppose I could have arranged
to detect single-file commits and turned the subject into 'in this
non-module'? But there comes a time when even I think that maybe I might
be overdesigning something, and automated grammatical adjustments to the
subject line was that point!)

-- 
NULL && (void)