[GIT PULL] Microchip DT fixes for v6.0-rc4 (or later)
Conor.Dooley at microchip.com
Conor.Dooley at microchip.com
Sat Sep 3 14:09:54 PDT 2022
On 03/09/2022 22:01, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Sep 2022 09:07:49 PDT (-0700), Conor.Dooley at microchip.com wrote:
>> Hey Palmer,
>>
>> Two patches here that are really not particularly urgent by themselves.
>> Both fix the interrupts dtbs_check warning that I introduced last week.
>>
>> As I said on my application mail: "patches for this dt-binding are
>> usually merged via the riscv tree so I have taken the liberty of
>> bundling it with the dts change".
>> I would have sat on this for a little & grouped it with some other
>> stuff, but Zong Li wants to do a rename of the binding [0] so to make
>> life easier for them (and avoid this change being clobbered...) I
>> decided to send this to you this week.
>>
>> I did not bother marking it CC: stable since it's just a binding
>> checker warning - to be honest, I'd have sent it via for-next if not
>> for the fact that the warning fixed by these patches went via fixes
>> and I didn't want tooling screaming at me for invalid Fixes: tags..
>>
>> If you wish to apply these patches to for-next instead, they are at:
>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20220825180417.1259360-1-mail@conchuod.ie/
>
> IMO it's fine to have these on fixes, but it was too late for rc4 -- I'm not
> really sure when the cutoff is, but I generally like to have at least an
> overnight run of the autobuilders (as they find bugs sometimes) and I
FWIW, my korg repo got added automatically to the autobuilders, so I don't
send anything your way unless I've got the BUILD SUCCESS email back from
LKP.
> try to avoid sending PRs on the weekend unless there's something super pressing
> going on.
>
> I've got this on fixes, I'll send them up next week -- probably early,
tbh, I am less concerned about Linus getting it than you, just wanted it
in /a/ riscv branch so Zong could base on something. It's so minor, so I
didn't care at all if it did go into rc4 or not.
> as I'll be on a flight on Wednesday night.
You coming directly to Dublin?
Conor.
>
> Thanks!
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Conor.
>>
>> The following changes since commit 1709c70c31e05e6e87b2ffa0a2b4cc0da4b2c513:
>>
>> Merge branch 'riscv-variable_fixes_without_kvm' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/palmer/linux.git into fixes (2022-08-25 16:38:01 -0700)
>>
>> are available in the Git repository at:
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/conor/linux.git/ tags/dt-fixes-for-palmer-6.0-rc4
>>
>> for you to fetch changes up to 0dec364ffeb6149aae572ded1e34d4b444c23be6:
>>
>> riscv: dts: microchip: use an mpfs specific l2 compatible (2022-08-31 16:57:51 +0100)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Microchip RISC-V devicetree fixes for 6.0-rc4 (or later)
>>
>> A fix for the warnings introduced in rc3 as part of fixing the console
>> spam from the L2's isr.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>> Conor Dooley (2):
>> dt-bindings: riscv: sifive-l2: add a PolarFire SoC compatible
>> riscv: dts: microchip: use an mpfs specific l2 compatible
>>
>> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml | 79 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
>> arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs.dtsi | 2 +-
>> 2 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list