[PATCH] RISC-V: Fix /proc/cpuinfo cpumask warning
Andrew Jones
ajones at ventanamicro.com
Tue Oct 11 11:23:56 PDT 2022
Boris pointed out on my x86 version of this patch that I didn't
give nearly enough information on why I sent it. Sorry about that!
I've tried to fill in some of that information in my reply to him
[1]. Sorry for lazily just pointing to that link here, but I'll
send a v2 with the information properly added tomorrow.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221011181715.dpayrpjueha7kxoj@kamzik/
Thanks,
drew
On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 07:50:40PM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> Upcoming cpumask changes will start issuing warnings[*] when cpu
> indices equal to nr_cpu_ids are passed to cpumask_next* functions.
> Ensure we don't generate a warning when reading /proc/cpuinfo by
> validating the cpu index before calling cpumask_next().
>
> [*] Warnings will only appear with DEBUG_PER_CPU_MAPS enabled.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Jones <ajones at ventanamicro.com>
> Cc: Yury Norov <yury.norov at gmail.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> index 4aa8cd749441..592ff065e09f 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> @@ -166,9 +166,12 @@ static void print_mmu(struct seq_file *f)
>
> static void *c_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
> {
> - *pos = cpumask_next(*pos - 1, cpu_online_mask);
> - if ((*pos) < nr_cpu_ids)
> - return (void *)(uintptr_t)(1 + *pos);
> + if (*pos < nr_cpu_ids) {
> + *pos = cpumask_next(*pos - 1, cpu_online_mask);
> + if (*pos < nr_cpu_ids)
> + return (void *)(uintptr_t)(1 + *pos);
> + }
> +
> return NULL;
> }
>
> --
> 2.37.3
>
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list