[PATCH 6/6] riscv: dts: renesas: Add initial devicetree for Renesas RZ/Five SoC
Conor.Dooley at microchip.com
Conor.Dooley at microchip.com
Tue Jul 26 11:25:10 PDT 2022
Hey,
Saw your other binding patches coming in earlier & wondered if
this would show up today ;)
On 26/07/2022 19:06, Lad Prabhakar wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> Add initial device tree for Renesas RZ/Five RISC-V CPU Core (AX45MP
> Single).
>
> Below is the list of IP blocks added in the initial SoC DTSI which can be
> used to boot via initramfs on RZ/Five SMARC EVK:
> - AX45MP CPU
> - CPG
> - PINCTRL
> - PLIC
> - SCIF0
> - SYSC
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj at bp.renesas.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 +
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g043.dtsi | 121 +++++++++++++++++++++
Missing files? Where is your Makefile for this directory?
Or the board dts?
Enabling CONFIG_SOC_RENESAS_RZFIVE causes dtbs_check to fail :(
> 2 files changed, 122 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g043.dtsi
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/Makefile
> index ff174996cdfd..b0ff5fbabb0c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/Makefile
> @@ -3,5 +3,6 @@ subdir-y += sifive
> subdir-y += starfive
> subdir-$(CONFIG_SOC_CANAAN_K210_DTB_BUILTIN) += canaan
> subdir-y += microchip
> +subdir-y += renesas
>
> obj-$(CONFIG_BUILTIN_DTB) := $(addsuffix /, $(subdir-y))
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g043.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g043.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6e0b640c6c7f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/renesas/r9a07g043.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +/*
> + * Device Tree Source for the RZ/Five SoC
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2022 Renesas Electronics Corp.
> + */
> +
> +#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
Including arm gic stuff on riscv? That seems a bit odd to me.
> +#include <dt-bindings/clock/r9a07g043-cpg.h>
> +
> +/ {
> + compatible = "renesas,r9a07g043";
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> +
> + /* clock can be either from exclk or crystal oscillator (XIN/XOUT) */
> + extal_clk: extal-clk {
> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> + /* This value must be overridden by the board */
> + clock-frequency = <0>;
Why add the empty value in that case?
> + };
> +
> + cpus {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + timebase-frequency = <24000000>;
> +
> + ax45mp: cpu at 0 {
> + compatible = "andestech,ax45mp", "riscv";
> + device_type = "cpu";
> + reg = <0x0>;
> + status = "okay";
> + riscv,isa = "rv64imafdc";
> + mmu-type = "riscv,sv39";
> + i-cache-size = <0x8000>;
> + i-cache-line-size = <0x40>;
> + d-cache-size = <0x8000>;
> + d-cache-line-size = <0x40>;
> + clocks = <&cpg CPG_CORE R9A07G043_AX45MP_CORE0_CLK>,
> + <&cpg CPG_CORE R9A07G043_AX45MP_ACLK>;
> +
> + cpu0_intc: interrupt-controller {
> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> + compatible = "riscv,cpu-intc";
> + interrupt-controller;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +
> + soc: soc {
> + compatible = "simple-bus";
> + interrupt-parent = <&plic>;
> + #address-cells = <2>;
> + #size-cells = <2>;
> + ranges;
> +
> + scif0: serial at 1004b800 {
> + compatible = "renesas,scif-r9a07g043",
> + "renesas,scif-r9a07g044";
> + reg = <0 0x1004b800 0 0x400>;
> + interrupts = <412 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <414 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <415 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <413 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <416 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> + <416 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> + interrupt-names = "eri", "rxi", "txi",
> + "bri", "dri", "tei";
> + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD R9A07G043_SCIF0_CLK_PCK>;
> + clock-names = "fck";
> + power-domains = <&cpg>;
> + resets = <&cpg R9A07G043_SCIF0_RST_SYSTEM_N>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + cpg: clock-controller at 11010000 {
> + compatible = "renesas,r9a07g043-cpg";
> + reg = <0 0x11010000 0 0x10000>;
> + clocks = <&extal_clk>;
> + clock-names = "extal";
> + #clock-cells = <2>;
> + #reset-cells = <1>;
> + #power-domain-cells = <0>;
> + };
> +
> + sysc: system-controller at 11020000 {
> + compatible = "renesas,r9a07g043-sysc";
> + reg = <0 0x11020000 0 0x10000>;
> + status = "disabled";
> + };
> +
> + pinctrl: pinctrl at 11030000 {
> + compatible = "renesas,r9a07g043-pinctrl";
> + reg = <0 0x11030000 0 0x10000>;
> + gpio-controller;
> + #gpio-cells = <2>;
> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + gpio-ranges = <&pinctrl 0 0 152>;
> + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD R9A07G043_GPIO_HCLK>;
> + power-domains = <&cpg>;
> + resets = <&cpg R9A07G043_GPIO_RSTN>,
> + <&cpg R9A07G043_GPIO_PORT_RESETN>,
> + <&cpg R9A07G043_GPIO_SPARE_RESETN>;
> + };
> +
> + plic: interrupt-controller at 12c00000 {
> + compatible = "renesas,r9a07g043-plic", "andestech,nceplic100";
> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> + #address-cells = <0>;
> + riscv,ndev = <543>;
> + interrupt-controller;
> + reg = <0x0 0x12c00000 0 0x400000>;
Does reg not usually get sorted after compatible?
For consistency in this file it should at least.
Thanks,
Conor.
> + clocks = <&cpg CPG_MOD R9A07G043_NCEPLIC_ACLK>;
> + power-domains = <&cpg>;
> + resets = <&cpg R9A07G043_NCEPLIC_ARESETN>;
> + interrupts-extended = <&cpu0_intc 11 &cpu0_intc 9>;
> + };
> + };
> +};
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list