[PATCH -next 2/2] spi: microchip-core: switch to use devm_spi_alloc_master()
Conor.Dooley at microchip.com
Conor.Dooley at microchip.com
Tue Jul 12 13:50:54 PDT 2022
On 12/07/2022 15:03, Conor.Dooley at microchip.com wrote:
> On 12/07/2022 14:53, Yang Yingliang wrote:
>> [Some people who received this message don't often get email from yangyingliang at huawei.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
>>
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>
>> Switch to use devm_spi_alloc_master() to simpify error path.
>
> Hey Yang,
> Thanks for trying to fix my mistakes!
>
> Forgive my innocence here, but why is it okay to remove the
> spi_master_put() in remove() but not the one in the error path of
> the probe function?
>
> If the devm_add_action_or_reset() in devm_spi_register_controller()
> fails won't the same thing apply to the probe error path?
>
> IOW, I think this patch needs a fixes tag too b/c it also fixes a
> refcount underflow. Please correct me if I am misunderstanding.
Ahh, I just saw your revert of 59ebbe40fb51 ("spi: simplify
devm_spi register_controller"). With that, this makes a lot more
sense.
>
> One other comment below.
This comment still applies for this patch. dev_err_probe would be
nice.
Thanks,
Conor.
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang at huawei.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c | 20 +++++++-------------
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c b/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c
>> index c26767343176..1a24e47f8305 100644
>> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-microchip-core.c
>> @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ static int mchp_corespi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> u32 num_cs;
>> int ret = 0;
>>
>> - master = spi_alloc_master(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*spi));
>> + master = devm_spi_alloc_master(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*spi));
>> if (!master)
>> return dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, -ENOMEM,
>> "unable to allocate master for SPI controller\n");
>> @@ -535,36 +535,32 @@ static int mchp_corespi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> spi = spi_master_get_devdata(master);
>>
>> spi->regs = devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0, &res);
>> - if (IS_ERR(spi->regs)) {
>> - ret = PTR_ERR(spi->regs);
>> - goto error_release_master;
>> - }
>> + if (IS_ERR(spi->regs))
>> + return PTR_ERR(spi->regs);
>>
>> spi->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> if (spi->irq <= 0) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "invalid IRQ %d for SPI controller\n", spi->irq);
>> - ret = -ENXIO;
>> - goto error_release_master;
>> + return -ENXIO;
>
> Also these can now become dev_err_probe for further simplification?
> Thanks,
> Conor.
>
>> }
>>
>> ret = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, spi->irq, mchp_corespi_interrupt,
>> IRQF_SHARED, dev_name(&pdev->dev), master);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not request irq: %d\n", ret);
>> - goto error_release_master;
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> spi->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
>> if (IS_ERR(spi->clk)) {
>> - ret = PTR_ERR(spi->clk);
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not get clk: %d\n", ret);
>> - goto error_release_master;
>> + return PTR_ERR(spi->clk);
>> }
>>
>> ret = clk_prepare_enable(spi->clk);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to enable clock\n");
>> - goto error_release_master;
>> + return ret;
>> }
>>
>> mchp_corespi_init(master, spi);
>> @@ -583,8 +579,6 @@ static int mchp_corespi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> error_release_hardware:
>> mchp_corespi_disable(spi);
>> clk_disable_unprepare(spi->clk);
>> -error_release_master:
>> - spi_master_put(master);
>>
>> return ret;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list