On Tue, Jul 05, 2022 at 10:00:42PM -0700, Andrii Nakryiko wrote: > riscv existed as of [0], so I'd argue it is a proper bug fix, as > corresponding select ARCH_HAS_NON_OVERLAPPING_ADDRESS_SPACE should > have been added back then. How much of an eBPF ecosystem was there on RISC-V at the point?