[PATCH 2/3] soc: sifive: l2 cache: Rename SiFive L2 cache to composible cache.

[Zong Li]

<Conor.Dooley at microchip.com> 於 2022年8月30日 週二 下午4:42寫道：
>
> On 29/08/2022 09:40, Zong Li wrote:
> > EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 29, 2022 at 3:05 PM <Conor.Dooley at microchip.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hey Zong,
> >>
> >> On 29/08/2022 07:22, Zong Li wrote:
> >>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> >>>
> >>> From: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu at sifive.com>
> >>>
> >>> Since composible cache may be L3 cache if pL2 cache exists, we should use
> >>> its original name composible cache to prevent confusion.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu <greentime.hu at sifive.com>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Zong Li <zong.li at sifive.com>
>
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/sifive/Kconfig b/drivers/soc/sifive/Kconfig
> >>> index 58cf8c40d08d..3d65d2771f9a 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/soc/sifive/Kconfig
> >>> +++ b/drivers/soc/sifive/Kconfig
> >>> @@ -2,9 +2,10 @@
> >>>
> >>>    if SOC_SIFIVE
> >>>
> >>> -config SIFIVE_L2
> >>> -       bool "Sifive L2 Cache controller"
> >>> +config SIFIVE_CCACHE
> >>> +       bool "Sifive composable Cache controller"
> >>> +       default y
> >>
> >> Changing this to default on is not a rename of the file..
> >> This should be in a different patch.
> >
> > Okay, let me separate it to another patch, but I guess we could remove
> > it, and enable it by user. What is your perspective on it?
>
> Personally I would like to leave the default y out & leave it up
> to the user - the driver is more informational than anything else
> so I don't think making it default to on makes sense.
>

Agree, let me remove it in the next version. Thanks

>
>
> >>> +
> >>> +#define SIFIVE_CCACHE_DIRECCFIX_LOW 0x100
> >>> +#define SIFIVE_CCACHE_DIRECCFIX_HIGH 0x104
> >>> +#define SIFIVE_CCACHE_DIRECCFIX_COUNT 0x108
> >>> +
> >>> +#define SIFIVE_CCACHE_DATECCFIX_LOW 0x140
> >>> +#define SIFIVE_CCACHE_DATECCFIX_HIGH 0x144
> >>> +#define SIFIVE_CCACHE_DATECCFIX_COUNT 0x148
> >>> +
> >>> +#define SIFIVE_CCACHE_DATECCFAIL_LOW 0x160
> >>> +#define SIFIVE_CCACHE_DATECCFAIL_HIGH 0x164
> >>> +#define SIFIVE_CCACHE_DATECCFAIL_COUNT 0x168
> >>> +
> >>> +#define SIFIVE_CCACHE_CONFIG 0x00
> >>> +#define SIFIVE_CCACHE_WAYENABLE 0x08
> >>> +#define SIFIVE_CCACHE_ECCINJECTERR 0x40
> >>
> >>   From what I can see, you've also changed these around too?
> >> Please generate the patch's diff so that the rename is detected & the
> >> diff shows only what changed in the file. The -M option is what you
> >> are looking for.
> >>
> >> I have a couple other comments to make about what's changed here other,
> >> thatn the rename but I will do so against a v2 where the diff is usable.
> >>
> >
> > Let me sent the v2 patch, and separate the rename and diff part
>
> Great, thanks. I'll take another look at it then.
>
> Conor.
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv