[PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: riscv: sifive-l2: add a PolarFire SoC compatible
Rob Herring
robh+dt at kernel.org
Tue Aug 30 13:57:10 PDT 2022
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 1:36 PM Heinrich Schuchardt
<heinrich.schuchardt at canonical.com> wrote:
>
> On 8/25/22 20:04, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
> >
> > The l2 cache on PolarFire SoC is cross between that of the fu540 and
> > the fu740. It has the extra interrupt from the fu740 but the lower
> > number of cache-sets. Add a specific compatible to avoid the likes
> > of:
> >
> > mpfs-polarberry.dtb: cache-controller at 2010000: interrupts: [[1], [3], [4], [2]] is too long
>
> Where is such a message written? I couldn't find the string in
> next-20220825 (git grep -n 'is too long"').
>
> Why should a different number of cache sets require an extra compatible
> string. cache-size is simply a parameter going with the existing
> compatible strings.
>
> I would assume that you only need an extra compatible string if there is
> a functional difference that can not be expressed with the existing
> parameters.
Correct, but you have to account for unknown functional differences
aka errata as well. Otherwise, we need firmware updates to enable the
OS to handle errata.
> > Fixes: 34fc9cc3aebe ("riscv: dts: microchip: correct L2 cache interrupts")
> > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley at microchip.com>
> > ---
> > .../bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml | 79 ++++++++++++-------
> > 1 file changed, 49 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
> > index 69cdab18d629..ca3b9be58058 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/riscv/sifive-l2-cache.yaml
> > @@ -17,9 +17,6 @@ description:
> > acts as directory-based coherency manager.
> > All the properties in ePAPR/DeviceTree specification applies for this platform.
> >
> > -allOf:
> > - - $ref: /schemas/cache-controller.yaml#
> > -
> > select:
> > properties:
> > compatible:
> > @@ -33,11 +30,16 @@ select:
> >
> > properties:
> > compatible:
> > - items:
> > - - enum:
> > - - sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
> > - - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
>
> Why can't you simply add microchip,mpfs-ccache here?
>
> > - - const: cache
> > + oneOf:
> > + - items:
> > + - enum:
> > + - sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
> > + - sifive,fu740-c000-ccache
> > + - const: cache
> > + - items:
> > + - const: microchip,mpfs-ccache
> > + - const: sifive,fu540-c000-ccache
>
> Why do we need 'sifive,fu540-c000-ccache' twice?
Because it is in 2 different positions. While we can express that the
last N entries in a list are optional, there is no way in json-schema
to express entries at the beginning or in the middle are optional.
Rob
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list