Apply f2928e224d85e7cc139009ab17cefdfec2df5d11 to 5.15 and 5.10?

[Nathan Chancellor]

Hi all,

Would it be reasonable to apply commit f2928e224d85 ("riscv: set default
pm_power_off to NULL") to 5.10 and 5.15? I see the following issue when
testing OpenSUSE's RISC-V configuration in QEMU and it is resolved with
that change.

Requesting system poweroff
[    4.497128][  T177] reboot: Power down
[   32.045207][    C0] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 26s! [init:177]
[   32.045785][    C0] Modules linked in:
[   32.046166][    C0] CPU: 0 PID: 177 Comm: init Not tainted 5.15.60-default #1 5b276f06901b1c37142db73337a1816290810c90
[   32.046814][    C0] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
[   32.047256][    C0] epc : default_power_off+0x1a/0x20
[   32.047667][    C0]  ra : machine_power_off+0x22/0x2a
[   32.047979][    C0] epc : ffffffff80004a4a ra : ffffffff80004abe sp : ffffffd000bc3d50
[   32.048405][    C0]  gp : ffffffff81bec160 tp : ffffffe002080000 t0 : ffffffff80490964
[   32.048827][    C0]  t1 : 0720072007200720 t2 : 50203a746f6f6265 s0 : ffffffd000bc3d60
[   32.049245][    C0]  s1 : 000000004321fedc a0 : 0000000000000004 a1 : ffffffff81b073c8
[   32.049676][    C0]  a2 : 0000000000000010 a3 : 00000000000000ab a4 : e0b1d187e51c7400
[   32.050115][    C0]  a5 : ffffffff80004a30 a6 : c0000000ffffdfff a7 : ffffffff804ea464
[   32.050555][    C0]  s2 : 0000000000000000 s3 : ffffffff81a20390 s4 : fffffffffee1dead
[   32.051009][    C0]  s5 : ffffffff81bee0c8 s6 : 0000003feff55a70 s7 : 0000002acc09bf08
[   32.051427][    C0]  s8 : 0000000000000001 s9 : 0000000000000000 s10: 0000002b0a4db6e0
[   32.051849][    C0]  s11: 0000000000000000 t3 : ffffffe001e2bf00 t4 : ffffffe001e2bf00
[   32.052274][    C0]  t5 : ffffffe001e2b000 t6 : ffffffd000bc3ac8
[   32.052604][    C0] status: 0000000000000120 badaddr: 0000000000000000 cause: 8000000000000005
qemu-system-riscv64: terminating on signal 15 from pid 2356237 (timeout)

I am not sure if there is any regression potential with that change,
hence this email. That change applies cleanly to both trees and I don't
see any additional problems from it.

Cheers,
Nathan