[PATCH V7] irqchip/sifive-plic: Fixup EOI failed when masked
Guo Ren
guoren at kernel.org
Sun Nov 7 05:09:38 PST 2021
On Sat, Nov 6, 2021 at 9:45 PM Anup Patel <anup at brainfault.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2021 at 3:18 PM <guoren at kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Guo Ren <guoren at linux.alibaba.com>
> >
> > When using "devm_request_threaded_irq(,,,,IRQF_ONESHOT,,)" in the driver,
> > only the first interrupt could be handled, and continue irq is blocked by
> > hw. Because the riscv plic couldn't complete masked irq source which has
> > been disabled in enable register. The bug was firstly reported in [1].
> >
> > Here is the description of Interrupt Completion in PLIC spec [2]:
> >
> > The PLIC signals it has completed executing an interrupt handler by
> > writing the interrupt ID it received from the claim to the claim/complete
> > register. The PLIC does not check whether the completion ID is the same
> > as the last claim ID for that target. If the completion ID does not match
> > an interrupt source that is currently enabled for the target, the
> > ^^ ^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^
> > completion is silently ignored.
> >
> > [1] http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-riscv/2021-July/007441.html
> > [2] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-plic-spec/blob/8bc15a35d07c9edf7b5d23fec9728302595ffc4d/riscv-plic.adoc
> >
> > Fixes: bb0fed1c60cc ("irqchip/sifive-plic: Switch to fasteoi flow")
> > Reported-by: Vincent Pelletier <plr.vincent at gmail.com>
> > Tested-by: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin at maquefel.me>
> > Signed-off-by: Guo Ren <guoren at linux.alibaba.com>
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Anup Patel <anup at brainfault.org>
Thx
@Marc Zyngier
Could you help to take the patch into your tree include "Anup's
Reviewed-by"? Or Let me update a new version of the patch.
>
> Regards,
> Anup
>
> > Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: Anup Patel <anup at brainfault.org>
> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx at linutronix.de>
> > Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz at kernel.org>
> > Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer at dabbelt.com>
> > Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra at wdc.com>
> > Cc: Nikita Shubin <nikita.shubin at maquefel.me>
> > Cc: incent Pelletier <plr.vincent at gmail.com>
> >
> > ---
> >
> > Changes since V7:
> > - Add Fixes tag
> > - Add Tested-by
> > - Add Cc stable
> >
> > Changes since V6:
> > - Propagate to plic_irq_eoi for all riscv,plic by Nikita Shubin
> > - Remove thead related codes
> >
> > Changes since V5:
> > - Move back to mask/unmask
> > - Fixup the problem in eoi callback
> > - Remove allwinner,sun20i-d1 IRQCHIP_DECLARE
> > - Rewrite comment log
> >
> > Changes since V4:
> > - Update comment by Anup
> >
> > Changes since V3:
> > - Rename "c9xx" to "c900"
> > - Add sifive_plic_chip and thead_plic_chip for difference
> >
> > Changes since V2:
> > - Add a separate compatible string "thead,c9xx-plic"
> > - set irq_mask/unmask of "plic_chip" to NULL and point
> > irq_enable/disable of "plic_chip" to plic_irq_mask/unmask
> > - Add a detailed comment block in plic_init() about the
> > differences in Claim/Completion process of RISC-V PLIC and C9xx
> > PLIC.
> > ---
> > drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 8 +++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> > index cf74cfa82045..259065d271ef 100644
> > --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> > +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
> > @@ -163,7 +163,13 @@ static void plic_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
> > {
> > struct plic_handler *handler = this_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers);
> >
> > - writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
> > + if (irqd_irq_masked(d)) {
> > + plic_irq_unmask(d);
> > + writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
> > + plic_irq_mask(d);
> > + } else {
> > + writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
> > + }
> > }
> >
> > static struct irq_chip plic_chip = {
> > --
> > 2.25.1
> >
--
Best Regards
Guo Ren
ML: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-csky/
More information about the linux-riscv
mailing list