arch/riscv/staging

[Greg Kroah-Hartman]

On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 10:29:16AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 28/05/21 03:06, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > OK, well, maybe you and Damien can get together and spell out what you all
> > are concerned about regarding forks.  Then we can see if there's anything
> > that should be done to address it.
> > 
> > Right now the only fork risk that I can see is related to the architecture
> > itself.
> 
> The risk is that improvements to KVM RISC-V are developed in forks rather
> than in a single git tree.

Eventually they need to come back into the mainline tree, so that should
not be that big of an issue.

If it is, again, get the spec finished, what is preventing that from
happening this week?

thanks,

greg k-h