[PATCH v19 01/17] clk: Add RISC-V Canaan Kendryte K210 clock driver

[Damien Le Moal]

On 2021/02/11 11:56, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Damien Le Moal (2021-02-10 18:41:45)
>> On 2021/02/11 11:34, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Quoting Damien Le Moal (2021-02-09 21:02:14)
>>>> Add a clock provider driver for the Canaan Kendryte K210 RISC-V SoC.
>>>> This new driver with the compatible string "canaan,k210-clk" implements
>>>> support for the full clock structure of the K210 SoC. Since it is
>>>> required for the correct operation of the SoC, this driver is
>>>> selected by default for compilation when the SOC_CANAAN option is
>>>> selected.
>>>>
>>>> With this change, the k210-sysctl driver is turned into a simple
>>>> platform driver which enables its power bus clock and triggers
>>>> populating its child nodes. The sysctl driver retains the SOC early
>>>> initialization code, but the implementation now relies on the new
>>>> function k210_clk_early_init() provided by the new clk-k210 driver.
>>>>
>>>> The clock structure implemented and many of the coding ideas for the
>>>> driver come from the work by Sean Anderson on the K210 support for the
>>>> U-Boot project.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd at kernel.org>
>>>> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette at baylibre.com>
>>>> Cc: linux-clk at vger.kernel.org
>>>> Signed-off-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal at wdc.com>
>>>> ---
>>>
>>> No change log :/
>>
>> It is in the cover letter :)
> 
> Ok I don't see the cover letter but maybe I missed it.

I checked and it looks like I messed up (again) my git-send-email CC list. I had
added you and linux-clk to the cover letter CC but it did not work. My apologies.

The last changelog entry said:

Changes from v18:
* Added review and ack tags
* Addressed Stephen's comments on the clock driver:
  - Moved MAINTAINER file update to new patch 0002
  - Code style nits
  - Use of __init declarations for k210_register_xxx() functions
  - Use of of_clk_hw_register() instead of clk_hw_register()
  - Removed the need for in0 clock name

Thanks !

> 
>>
>>>
>>> Minor nitpicks but otherwise
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd at kernel.org>
>>
>> Thanks !
>>
>> I will address your nits in follow up patches. I really want to get this queued
>> in 5.12. So not resending a v20 :)
>>
> 
> Sure.
> 


-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research