[PATCH for-next] riscv/mm/fault: Fix inline placement in vmalloc_fault() declaration

Pekka Enberg penberg at kernel.org
Sat Sep 5 01:52:52 EDT 2020


The "inline" keyword is in the wrong place in vmalloc_fault()
declaration:

>> arch/riscv/mm/fault.c:56:1: warning: 'inline' is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]
      56 | static void inline vmalloc_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, int code, unsigned long addr)
         | ^~~~~~

Fix that up.

Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp at intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Pekka Enberg <penberg at kernel.org>
---
 arch/riscv/mm/fault.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/fault.c b/arch/riscv/mm/fault.c
index a23eaf5ce95c..a173432ccf82 100644
--- a/arch/riscv/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/riscv/mm/fault.c
@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ static inline void bad_area(struct pt_regs *regs, struct mm_struct *mm, int code
 	no_context(regs, addr);
 }
 
-static void inline vmalloc_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, int code, unsigned long addr)
+static inline void vmalloc_fault(struct pt_regs *regs, int code, unsigned long addr)
 {
 	pgd_t *pgd, *pgd_k;
 	pud_t *pud, *pud_k;
-- 
2.26.2




More information about the linux-riscv mailing list