[PATCH v4 2/4] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Document the Glymur PCIe Controller
Qiang Yu
qiang.yu at oss.qualcomm.com
Tue Oct 14 18:50:37 PDT 2025
On Sun, Oct 12, 2025 at 05:01:45AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 11/10/2025 14:15, Abel Vesa wrote:
> >>
> >> properties:
> >> compatible:
> >> - const: qcom,pcie-x1e80100
> >> + oneOf:
> >> + - const: qcom,pcie-x1e80100
> >> + - items:
> >> + - enum:
> >> + - qcom,glymur-pcie
> >> + - const: qcom,pcie-x1e80100
> >>
> >
> > The cnoc_sf_axi clock is not found on Glymur, at least according to this:
> >
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250925-v3_glymur_introduction-v1-19-24b601bbecc0@oss.qualcomm.com/
> >
> > And dtbs_check reports the following:
> >
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur-crd.dtb: pci at 1b40000 (qcom,glymur-pcie): clock-names: ['aux', 'cfg', 'bus_master', 'bus_slave', 'slave_q2a', 'noc_aggr'] is too short
> > from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pci/qcom,pcie-x1e80100.yaml#
> >
> > One more thing:
> >
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur-crd.dtb: pci at 1b40000 (qcom,glymur-pcie): max-link-speed: 5 is not one of [1, 2, 3, 4]
> > from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/pci/qcom,pcie-x1e80100.yaml#
> >
>
> So that's another Glymur patch which wasn't ever tested?
I tested all of these patch and also did dtb checks. That's how I found
cnoc_sf_axi clock is not required. There was a discussion about whether we
need to limit max speed to 16 GT and I limited it. I may forget to do dtb
checks again after changing it to 32 GT. Let me push another patch to fix
this.
- Qiang Yu
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
More information about the linux-phy
mailing list