[PATCH V1 1/4] scsi: ufs: phy: dt-bindings: Add QMP UFS PHY compatible for Hamoa
Krzysztof Kozlowski
krzk at kernel.org
Tue Dec 30 01:38:38 PST 2025
On 30/12/2025 10:05, Pradeep Pragallapati wrote:
>
> On 12/29/2025 12:41 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 29/12/2025 07:06, Pradeep P V K wrote:
>>> Document the QMP UFS PHY compatible for Qualcomm Hamoa to support
>>> physical layer functionality for UFS found on the SoC. Use fallback to
>>> indicate the compatibility of the QMP UFS PHY on the Hamoa with that
>>> on the SM8550.
>> Last sentence is pointless. You keep explaining what you did, but you
>> did not say why. Why Hamoa is compatible with SM8550, but not with SM8650?
> i will update in my next patchset.
Actually the problem is that you introduced completely new SoC name -
Hamoa - so that's why I was wondering. If you used correct name, X1E, it
would be more logical as it is basically SM8550.
But then follow up question - why are you duplicating existing patches?
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/20250814005904.39173-2-harrison.vanderbyl@gmail.com/
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/p3mhtj2rp6y2ezuwpd2gu7dwx5cbckfu4s4pazcudi4j2wogtr@4yecb2bkeyms/
Best regards,
Krzysztof
More information about the linux-phy
mailing list