[PATCH v7 5/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 combo ssphy

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 29/08/2025 12:15, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk at kernel.org>
>> Sent: 26 August 2025 02:05 PM
>> To: Pritam Manohar Sutar <pritam.sutar at samsung.com>
>> Cc: vkoul at kernel.org; kishon at kernel.org; robh at kernel.org;
> .
> .
> [snip]
> .
> .
>>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 5/6] dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy:
>>>> add
>>>> ExynosAutov920 combo ssphy
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 22, 2025 at 03:08:44PM +0530, Pritam Manohar Sutar wrote:
>>>>> This phy supports USB3.1 SSP+(10Gbps) protocol and is backwards
>>>>> compatible to the USB3.0 SS(5Gbps). It requires two clocks, named
>>>>> "phy" and "ref". The required supplies for USB3.1 are named as
>>>>> vdd075_usb30(0.75v), vdd18_usb30(1.8v).
>>>>
>>>> Please do not describe the schema, but hardware. This sentence does
>>>> not help me in my question further.
>>>
>>> This is a combo phy having Synopsys usb20 and usb30 phys (these 2 phys are
>> totally different).
>>> One PHY only supports usb2.0 and data rates whereas another one does
>>> usb3.1 ssp+ and usb3.1 ssp
>>>
>>> This patch only explains about usb30 (since these are two different phys) phy
>> and omitted inclusion of usb20 reference (added separate patch for this patch
>> no 3).
>>>
>>> Hope this is clear.
>>
>> No. That sentence still explains what schema is doing.
>>
> 
> Ok, let me simplify the commit message further something like below. 
> Anyways, the coverletter contains more details about it.
> 
> "dt-bindings: phy: samsung,usb3-drd-phy: add ExynosAutov920 combo ssphy
> 
>   Add schema for combo ssphy found on this SoC.
> "
> 
> Please confirm if this looks fine?
> If so, will reflect the similar commit messages in patch 1 and 3.

Please read my first comment again. I do not see how does this satisfy
hardware explanation.

Best regards,
Krzysztof