[PATCH 8/9] dt-bindings: phy: sparx5: document lan969x in sparx5 dt-bindings

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 06/09/2024 14:52, Daniel Machon wrote:
> Document lan969x in the existing Sparx5 dt-bindings.
> 

Say something useful, not copy of subject.

> Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon at microchip.com>

A nit, subject: drop second/last, redundant "dt-bindings". The
"dt-bindings" prefix is already stating that these are bindings.
See also:
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.7-rc8/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.rst#L18


> Reviewed-by: Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund at microchip.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/phy/microchip,sparx5-serdes.yaml          | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/microchip,sparx5-serdes.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/microchip,sparx5-serdes.yaml
> index bdbdb3bbddbe..1e07a311e8a5 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/microchip,sparx5-serdes.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/microchip,sparx5-serdes.yaml
> @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ title: Microchip Sparx5 Serdes controller
>  
>  maintainers:
>    - Steen Hegelund <steen.hegelund at microchip.com>
> +  - Daniel Machon <daniel.machon at microchip.com>
>  
>  description: |
>    The Sparx5 SERDES interfaces share the same basic functionality, but
> @@ -62,12 +63,17 @@ description: |
>    * 10.3125 Gbps (10GBASE-R/10GBASE-KR/USXGMII)
>    * 25.78125 Gbps (25GBASE-KR/25GBASE-CR/25GBASE-SR/25GBASE-LR/25GBASE-ER)
>  
> +  lan969x has ten SERDES10G interfaces that share the same features, operating
> +  modes and data rates as the equivalent Sparx5 SERDES10G interfaces.
> +
>  properties:
>    $nodename:
>      pattern: "^serdes@[0-9a-f]+$"
>  
>    compatible:
> -    const: microchip,sparx5-serdes
> +    enum:
> +      - microchip,sparx5-serdes
> +      - microchip,lan969x-serdes

It seems there is no lan969x SoC/chip. Are you sure you are using
correct naming, matching what kernel is using? Maybe you just sent
whatever you had in downstream (hint: that's never a good idea).

>  
>    reg:
>      minItems: 1
> @@ -90,11 +96,19 @@ additionalProperties: false
>  
>  examples:
>    - |
> -    serdes: serdes at 10808000 {
> +    serdes at 10808000 {
>        compatible = "microchip,sparx5-serdes";
>        #phy-cells = <1>;
>        clocks = <&sys_clk>;
>        reg = <0x10808000 0x5d0000>;
>      };
>  
> +  - |
> +    serdes at e3410000 {
> +      compatible = "microchip,lan969x-serdes";
> +      #phy-cells = <1>;
> +      clocks = <&fabric_clk>;

No differences so no need for new example. Also please follow DTS coding
style in case of any DTS code.

Best regards,
Krzysztof