[PATCH 00/19] Add initial support for QCS8300

Krzysztof Kozlowski krzk at kernel.org
Wed Sep 4 02:34:41 PDT 2024


On 04/09/2024 10:33, Jingyi Wang wrote:
> Add initial support for QCS8300 SoC and QCS8300 RIDE board.
> 
> This revision brings support for:
> - CPUs with cpu idle
> - interrupt-controller with PDC wakeup support
> - gcc
> - TLMM
> - interconnect
> - qup with uart
> - smmu
> - pmic
> - ufs
> - ipcc
> - sram
> - remoteprocs including ADSP,CDSP and GPDSP
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jingyi Wang <quic_jingyw at quicinc.com>
> ---
> patch series organized as:
> - 1-2: remoteproc binding and driver
> - 3-5: ufs binding and driver
> - 6-7: rpmhpd binding and driver
> - 8-15: bindings for other components found on the SoC

Limit your CC list. I found like 8 unnecessary addresses for already
huge Cc list. Or organize your patches per subsystem, as we usually expect.

> - 16-19: changes to support the device tree
> 
> dependencies:
> tlmm: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20240819064933.1778204-1-quic_jingyw@quicinc.com/
> gcc: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240820-qcs8300-gcc-v1-0-d81720517a82@quicinc.com/
> interconnect: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-msm/20240827151622.305-1-quic_rlaggysh@quicinc.com/

Why? UFS cannot depend on pinctrl for example.

This blocks testing and merging.

Please organize properly (so decouple) your patches, so that there is no
fake dependency.

Best regards,
Krzysztof




More information about the linux-phy mailing list