[PATCH 02/16] dt-bindings: soc: renesas: renesas,rzg2l-sysc: Add #reset-cells for RZ/G3S
claudiu beznea
claudiu.beznea at tuxon.dev
Fri Aug 23 09:26:42 PDT 2024
On 23.08.2024 19:18, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2024 at 10:54:06AM +0300, claudiu beznea wrote:
>> Hi, Conor,
>>
>> On 22.08.2024 19:42, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 06:27:47PM +0300, Claudiu wrote:
>>>> From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj at bp.renesas.com>
>>>>
>>>> The RZ/G3S System controller has registers to control signals that need
>>>> to be de-asserted/asserted before/after different SoC areas are power
>>>> on/off. This signals are implemented as reset signals. For this document
>>>> the #reset-cells property.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj at bp.renesas.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> .../bindings/soc/renesas/renesas,rzg2l-sysc.yaml | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/renesas/renesas,rzg2l-sysc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/renesas/renesas,rzg2l-sysc.yaml
>>>> index 4386b2c3fa4d..6b0bb34485d9 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/renesas/renesas,rzg2l-sysc.yaml
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/renesas/renesas,rzg2l-sysc.yaml
>>>> @@ -42,12 +42,28 @@ properties:
>>>> - const: cm33stbyr_int
>>>> - const: ca55_deny
>>>>
>>>> + "#reset-cells":
>>>> + const: 1
>>>> +
>>>> required:
>>>> - compatible
>>>> - reg
>>>>
>>>> additionalProperties: false
>>>>
>>>> +allOf:
>>>> + - if:
>>>> + properties:
>>>> + compatible:
>>>> + contains:
>>>> + const: renesas,r9a08g045-sysc
>>>> + then:
>>>> + required:
>>>> + - "#reset-cells"
>>>
>>> Given this is new required property on an existing platform, I'd expect
>>> some mention of why it used to be okay to not have this but is now
>>> required. Did firmware or a bootloader stage take things out of reset?
>>
>> On previous SoCs the SYS controller has no support for controlling the
>> signals going to different peripherals (USB, PCIE in case of RZ/G3S).
>> I'll add a note about this on next version.
>
> My initial thought here wasn't about previous SoCs though, it was
> because you didn't add the compatible in this series for /this/ SoC.
RZ/G3S compatible is already present in this file:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/renesas/renesas,rzg2l-sysc.yaml#n26
Thank you,
Claudiu Beznea
> What's worth noting isn't about the prior SoCs, it is about what makes
> it okay for this one.
More information about the linux-phy
mailing list